As many of you have heard, “Roe” of Row v Wade infamy, made a deathbed confession, where she admitted that she was a paid actor, that she was told what to say, and that she lied about being raped.
And she did that, as part of a plan, a conspiracy, if you will, to legalize the industrial scale murder of 63,000,000 unborn babies.
As many of you know, the Boston Marathon Bombing was a DHS mass casualty drill/incident done under the Urban Shield program,
Nobody got hurt, nobody died.
It was a “drill gone live”, just like so many other false flags, including 9/11.
The US Supreme Court is going to decide, if the US government, and/or State government, has the authority to kill YOU, based on the Tsarnaev case.
While many “right leaning” people support the death penalty, i would like to point out that anyone who believes in “limited government” ought to belive in limiting the governments ability to kill you.
When the Governor of Illinois learned that HALF of the people on death row, were later exonerated, he put a moratorium on executions, until they could figure out why so many innocent people were on death row.
At the time, he was harshly criticized, partiularly by “the right”.
It seems the right can be just as much of a blood thirsty mob as the left can be.
And thats why we need to limit the governments ability to kill people,
Per the 8th amendment…
If the right-leaning SCOTUS rules in favor of allowing the government to kill its own people…
Whats to stop them from killing you?
We used to talk about the “sealed indictments”,
When there was only 5,000
Or 15,000
Or 50,000
And now theres some astronomical numer of sealed indictments, and nobody talks about it anymore.
What if one of those indictments is for you?
What if your government decided you has committed some crime, just by sharing info about Q ?
BOTH Iraq Wars were started, with a BIG LIE
The Vietnam War was started, with a BIG LIE.
WW2 was started, with a BIG LIE
And nobody ever gets in trouble,
Nobody goes to prison.
“To save the villiage, we had to destroy the villiage”
Oh, ok.
Well if you say so, then i guess Ill just have to trust you, again.
What are some other fake news stories that are being pushed to shape a narrative and an agenda?
I think of people took the time to edjucate temselves on how many are on death row, who comitted no crime everyone would agree.
I have researched a lot and there are far to many cases where evidence of innocence is in hand, but was not considered at trial. Too many crooked judges, too many crooked cops, DAs, Prosecutors etc. to keep the death penalty alive.
Death penalty should still stand for those that there is no question of guilt. But even o e innocent person recieving the death penalty is too much.
Now, combine the red flag laws, the miranda rights issue, the supreme court pushing things back to the state. You have an open door for innocent people to get targeted, get a shit lawyer, and be doomed to death.
Unless of course, you can afford a top notch attorney.
I've said for a long time that the Death Penalty can ONLY apply when incontrovertible DNA proof of guilt is proven.
If only on witness testimony, no Death Penalty. Only Life (or other long term).
BOTH with immediate Appeals - to be worked by different courts / different judges / prosecutors.
DNA proof is Pseudoscience at best and cop shows are there to make it looks way better than it is to someone whos never really seen it.