So.... the ATF could no longer willy nilly determine that gun parts that were approved and being sold for years were now "machine guns" or that a brace on a pistol is super illegal??
I'm sick of hearing this. We're all big boys here. It's not a brace. It's a stock designed to be designed to be a forearm brace. Nobody uses it as such. It's difficult to even find pictures of it being used as such.
"Pistol braces" are a loophole to a ridiculous law. Instead of demanding the ATF continues to honor this loophole, we should instead be focusing on changing the stupid law in the first place. Stocks do not make a weapon more dangerous. And, more importantly, shall not be infringed.
I'm not going to say that it was necessarily staged or whatever to ban pistol braces, but I will say definitively that the pistol brace itself did not make the weapon any more deadly. The dude was just shooting randomly into a crowd. Putting the gun against your shoulder does not help with that.
So.... the ATF could no longer willy nilly determine that gun parts that were approved and being sold for years were now "machine guns" or that a brace on a pistol is super illegal??
I'm sick of hearing this. We're all big boys here. It's not a brace. It's a stock designed to be designed to be a forearm brace. Nobody uses it as such. It's difficult to even find pictures of it being used as such.
"Pistol braces" are a loophole to a ridiculous law. Instead of demanding the ATF continues to honor this loophole, we should instead be focusing on changing the stupid law in the first place. Stocks do not make a weapon more dangerous. And, more importantly, shall not be infringed.
BOOM SON !!!!!!!
I'm not going to say that it was necessarily staged or whatever to ban pistol braces, but I will say definitively that the pistol brace itself did not make the weapon any more deadly. The dude was just shooting randomly into a crowd. Putting the gun against your shoulder does not help with that.