I'm sick of hearing this. We're all big boys here. It's not a brace. It's a stock designed to be designed to be a forearm brace. Nobody uses it as such. It's difficult to even find pictures of it being used as such.
"Pistol braces" are a loophole to a ridiculous law. Instead of demanding the ATF continues to honor this loophole, we should instead be focusing on changing the stupid law in the first place. Stocks do not make a weapon more dangerous. And, more importantly, shall not be infringed.
I'm not going to say that it was necessarily staged or whatever to ban pistol braces, but I will say definitively that the pistol brace itself did not make the weapon any more deadly. The dude was just shooting randomly into a crowd. Putting the gun against your shoulder does not help with that.
I'm sick of hearing this. We're all big boys here. It's not a brace. It's a stock designed to be designed to be a forearm brace. Nobody uses it as such. It's difficult to even find pictures of it being used as such.
"Pistol braces" are a loophole to a ridiculous law. Instead of demanding the ATF continues to honor this loophole, we should instead be focusing on changing the stupid law in the first place. Stocks do not make a weapon more dangerous. And, more importantly, shall not be infringed.
BOOM SON !!!!!!!
I'm not going to say that it was necessarily staged or whatever to ban pistol braces, but I will say definitively that the pistol brace itself did not make the weapon any more deadly. The dude was just shooting randomly into a crowd. Putting the gun against your shoulder does not help with that.