There's a secondary point you bring up here that I'd encourage everyone to look at when they get time. Whenever there's a 6-3 ruling that involves Roberts doing his effing job that leaves the 3 liberals to write the dissent, their prose is disturbingly laughable.
Many of you will be shocked (I know I was) at how laughably emotional many of their dissenting pieces are. Often there's very little reference to any kind of precedent, just whining. This isn't always the case, but it is the case a disturbingly large amount of time.
Kagan and Sotomayor are well known for their decisions being emotional and not having any legal substance whatsoever. How they became judges, let alone Supreme Court justices is beyond me
As we have seen many times: "Our rights do not stop at your feelings!" I read the opinions a while ago and this one is pure SJW all the way and NOT covered in any way by the Consitution that I can see.
There's a secondary point you bring up here that I'd encourage everyone to look at when they get time. Whenever there's a 6-3 ruling that involves Roberts doing his effing job that leaves the 3 liberals to write the dissent, their prose is disturbingly laughable.
Many of you will be shocked (I know I was) at how laughably emotional many of their dissenting pieces are. Often there's very little reference to any kind of precedent, just whining. This isn't always the case, but it is the case a disturbingly large amount of time.
Kagan and Sotomayor are well known for their decisions being emotional and not having any legal substance whatsoever. How they became judges, let alone Supreme Court justices is beyond me
I guess the answer to that question is corruption
Well, Obama did that, so...
As we have seen many times: "Our rights do not stop at your feelings!" I read the opinions a while ago and this one is pure SJW all the way and NOT covered in any way by the Consitution that I can see.
Truth.