But the only question before the Court
is more narrow: whether the “best system of emission reduction” iden-
tified by EPA in the Clean Powe r Plan was within the authority
granted to the Agency in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. For the
reasons given, the answer is no. Pp. 28–31.
985 F. 3d 914, reversed and remanded.
Unfortunately i think youre right that its not as broad as we hoped, however i still think this sets a precedent for more lawsuits in the future. This ruling tells us that theyre overstepping power under the guise of "solving todays energy crisis". Theyre creating legislation based on what they personally think is best, not what congress has specifically authorized them to do. Sound familiar? Cause thats what they do all the time. Now theres precedent to bring it to court.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf
Is anyone paying attention to this?
It's a narrow decision. Nothing broad. It's alright, but not what people were hoping for.
Unfortunately i think youre right that its not as broad as we hoped, however i still think this sets a precedent for more lawsuits in the future. This ruling tells us that theyre overstepping power under the guise of "solving todays energy crisis". Theyre creating legislation based on what they personally think is best, not what congress has specifically authorized them to do. Sound familiar? Cause thats what they do all the time. Now theres precedent to bring it to court.
The atf is the agency that comes to mind in fact just replace epa with atf and energy crisis with gun crisis