It’s a big step in limiting bureaucracies. It’s along the same lines as that EO Trump wrote towards the end, that Biden quickly reversed, that says that federal agencies have to review their employment rolls and determine which employees are at-will.
The idea that the power of executive agencies must be explicitly granted by Congress is a long-standing precedent. The issue is that "vagueness" is subjective, so it's treated on a case-by-case basis. This was just one of those cases. About a specific thing the EPA was doing granted to them by a specific piece of arguably vague legislation.
The court has ruled that the legislation was, indeed, too vague.
However, Congress absolutely can reaffirm this legislation, making it more specific, and allow the EPA to regulate exactly as they wanted.
Shouldn't this eradicate much of the criminal government?
That's the hope.
It’s a big step in limiting bureaucracies. It’s along the same lines as that EO Trump wrote towards the end, that Biden quickly reversed, that says that federal agencies have to review their employment rolls and determine which employees are at-will.
We need all the help we can get. To many government criminals running around.
No.
The idea that the power of executive agencies must be explicitly granted by Congress is a long-standing precedent. The issue is that "vagueness" is subjective, so it's treated on a case-by-case basis. This was just one of those cases. About a specific thing the EPA was doing granted to them by a specific piece of arguably vague legislation.
The court has ruled that the legislation was, indeed, too vague.
However, Congress absolutely can reaffirm this legislation, making it more specific, and allow the EPA to regulate exactly as they wanted.