SCOTUS issues order to drop mag bans, assault weapons bans, and carry bans!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (171)
sorted by:
Well. I'd be asking for a parachute the next time you take flight instead of a life jacket if that's your logic
There's no way a parachute would be of aid. And the design requirement on civil aircraft is only one chance in 10 million that a flight would be fatal. You don't have any logic, just magical thinking. I worked with high-pressure systems and munitions, and have an informed appreciation of the dimensions of something going wrong.
Hold up. So, if something wrong happens with the plane. A parachute would not be of aid? For real? So I shouldn't have a parachute because it's of no aid from heights... But safety specs when shooting is going to save my eyes?
No time to put a parachute on if the plane is in a maneuvering state. No access to independent oxygen. No safe way to exit the airplane. Stand by for the crash...
Yeah, if you are shooting at the range and a shell ejects and hits you square in the forehead, safety glasses will save your eyes. Or if the slide comes apart (Beretta M9 accidents) and whacks you in the face, they will save your eyes (maybe not your nose). Magic is no defense against accidents with equipment that operate under extreme forces. (And safety glasses are not parachutes.)
If it's in a maneuvering state. It's still more possible than it being low over water, yet they give you a life jacket. More opportunities to put on a parachute and survive than a lifejacket and survive. The real reason they do it is to cut costs. A casing although it may burn. It will not cause disfigurement. Although I did have one land on my leg and burn the fuck out of it. The specific variants of the Barretta M9 had manufacturing faults when it came to the slide coming off. It's still pretty rare. People should study their firearms before using them and take the appropriate PPE for that firearm. The majority of firearms are robust and reliable. I think specs and ear defenders should be the shooter's choice on whether they want to go deaf over time from excessive sound exposure, or have protection from an accident that is considerably rare. I know that I can't shoot wearing safety specs. Maybe just me or not enough training, but I was trained without and don't see the need. I will say, it would of been handy the first time shooting a semi automatic when I put my eye too close to the rear sight lol