Yeah, but not directed at say Remington for example. Or, smaller firearms retailers that do not do custom lowers/trigger assy/etc.
Sounds like that particular client has violated either state or federal laws concerning custom made firearm(s) and/or parts.
It's a company decision, in which they have the right to terminate a client for any reason but especially one that is tip-toeing firearms laws. Sounds like a liability decision based on UPS' end.
This sounds like a unique happening directed at one client as opposed to sweeping company wide policy effect.
Yeah, but not directed at say Remington for example. Or, smaller firearms retailers that do not do custom lowers/trigger assy/etc.
Sounds like that particular client has violated either state or federal laws concerning custom made firearm(s) and/or parts.
It's a company decision, in which they have the right to terminate a client for any reason but especially one that is tip-toeing firearms laws. Sounds like a liability decision based on UPS' end.
So this is a "woke" crackdown decision and not a "targetting guns" decision then.