Yeah, but not directed at say Remington for example. Or, smaller firearms retailers that do not do custom lowers/trigger assy/etc.
Sounds like that particular client has violated either state or federal laws concerning custom made firearm(s) and/or parts.
It's a company decision, in which they have the right to terminate a client for any reason but especially one that is tip-toeing firearms laws. Sounds like a liability decision based on UPS' end.
Yeah, but not directed at say Remington for example. Or, smaller firearms retailers that do not do custom lowers/trigger assy/etc.
Sounds like that particular client has violated either state or federal laws concerning custom made firearm(s) and/or parts.
It's a company decision, in which they have the right to terminate a client for any reason but especially one that is tip-toeing firearms laws. Sounds like a liability decision based on UPS' end.
So this is a "woke" crackdown decision and not a "targetting guns" decision then.