The plan went from defensive to offensive after the Roe vs. Wade ruling.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
I appreciate you. A subreddit like his is not at all a friendly opposition, and I tire of playing nice with the disingenuous.
He does indirectly present a curious thought though; what if they intend to cheat during midterms too specifically to try and make the number of people who support abortion appear the greater number, whilst also putting in candidates who will pass it as laws.
So, to be clear, you believe that Q may potentially be incorrect in post 2610 that 2020+ elections are safeguarded, and that Democrats may still successfully cheat and win in the midterms?
Or is there a different way to interpret that drop?
I don't directly buy into any specific drop, because our families are supposed to be safe and that demonstrably was untrue as your side kills them.
Thank you for the thorough response. You and I both can be wordy, so I want to make sure I understand the core of the answer to my question.
So you're saying that even if Democrats win big these midterms, you would not consider this to be a failed prediction of Q's post-2020 election "safeguard" guarantee, correct?
You seem to suggest "safeguard" doesn't necessarily mean "the election is unrigged for Democrats", or "MAGA candidates will sweep."
It seems to mean, "Even if Democrats rig the elections and steal everything, that's fine, because it was done under White Hat safeguards this time and therefore serves some purpose in service to the Plan." Safeguarded just seems to mean that Q is in control, and even if Democrats and RINOS do well, they'll be under Q's control.
Is that in the right ballpark?