Hillary Clinton's Eyes Were BROWN in 1985
(rumble.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
Congrats on not understanding that it doesn't fundamentally change someone's eye colour to brown from blue.
Camera red-eye is a particular effect, more so common in simple exposure cameras than television motion cameras. Never heard of brown turning blue, or blue turning brown.
We've had fairly accurate eye colours in movies since the advent and refinement of technicolor. You're claiming that it was entirely due to different technology.
How technologically limited do you think they were in 1985? Television cameras couldn't pick up individual colours? We were balls deep in a technological revolution.
Technology, which, does not alter any other colour to anything that wildly differs from it. Just the eyes.
Gotcha.
Your condescension is fun and all, but your dismissive attitude doesn't provide any actual evidence.
Do you have more "evidence" of her eyes being brown besides this one video which several have indicated could be a tech/quality issue? If so, post that evidence for review. If not, then stfu and stop being butt hurt because someone called you out for lack of sauce.
Nobody has pointed out the method in which a camera correctly displays blue, then arbitrarily changes eye colours from blue to brown, while perfectly maintaining all other blue hues.
"Lack of sauce". What, do you want a birth certificate with an eye colour on it?
You are the one making an assertion so it's up to you to make your case. From the comments, you are not convincing many. And yes, a birth certificate with eye color would be strong, if you have it. Pretty much anything in addition to the one suspect video would be a plus.
It was food for thought. It wasn't specifically meant to convince anyone of anything.
Ultimately it worked out as a great litmus test though.
You're helpless lol
edit: I shouldn't have to bring up that we've been constantly improving our color accuracy in film, cameras, displays, etc. IN THE PAST 35 YEARS. I didn't think you were that oblivious to the fuckin world, guy. My god.
And that still doesn't provide any sort of explanation as to why a camera would selectively alter a specific colour in a specific region on-screen.
Now, okay, if you google this topic, you can see old news sites with dead image links that purport that in 2003 Hillary started wearing contacts to go from brown to blue. Images have been scrubbed, but articles remain including references to an original Drudge article prior to whatever happened to Drudge.
And yet, in this video we see brown eyes in 1985.
Thus, either Hillary started wearing contacts far earlier, and the media was lying in 2003. Or there have been multiple Hillaries for decades, and communist infiltration is best achieved with a rotating cast of unstable stablemares.
Either scenario indicates that somebody was lying somewhere. I never even mentioned the possibility of doubles in my original post. Just that the eyes were different.
However, from the kneejerk reaction I got, it's clear that the subject makes people feel uncomfortable, and so there's something here that needs to be dug on further.
In this video I also see a color profile that makes her skin look a different color than it actually is, too. Thanks for all the hard work, anon. Keep honing in on that confirmation bias buddy
Confirmation of what? What is it that you think I'm trying to confirm here?
Again, skintone goes from "light brownish" to "dark brownish". It's not like she fucking turns bright green or anything.
Lighting issues aren't necessarily hue issues.
Again, you provide zero actual information, plenty of desperate uninformed counterproposals and mockery, but no actual information.