Just going off my own intiuition and observations of that event, it all seemed way to staged. I agree he is an operator, which side is anyone's guess.
I tend to follow three rules when dealing with any information or scenario:
Pay attention to your surroundings (observe)
Trust no one. Period. This does not apply to faith.
Question everything.
To answer your question of why prosecute him and not Epps, the answer is simple. Optics. I believe shammy's role was to always be in the camera. Both during and post J6.
Which leads me to your last sentence. Yes, I believe his role is to paint a broad picture of anons for the normie MSM zombies.
If Chansley's role was to paint anons as violent extremists, wouldn't he have at least had verbal confrontations with the capitol police and encouraged people to misbehave like Ray Epps did?
Chansley instead just appeared to be an amiable goofball.
I never said his role was to paint us as violent. The propaganda machine already does that.
His role (assuming) was to make us look absolutely crazy and to rabble rouse while at the J6 event.
Just because he didn't do a Braveheart Freeeeeedom! scream and storm the bldg does not mean he did not lead gullible folks and unknown bad actors inside. He was to be used as a figure head, both during and after J6 because as anons, we have no face to our movement. The enemy needed an identity to attach for the cameras.
Well, we can agree to disagree on this. I think Chansley is a good guy operator and he did his job well. You think he was a bad guy operator and did his job well.
Agreed. Like many other aspects of happenings the past several years.
Also to consider, is that it may be completely irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Overshadowed by much more significant future occurrences down the road. Often times anons find themselves obsessing over one dig or another and truly, even if it carries relevance to "XYZ..." it won't matter say, when the momentum shifts. Shit, the past several weeks are exemplary of that. We've had so many wins, happenings, comms, FF, etc.... It's rather easy to forget or dismiss the past. Which is not wise of course, but this train has no brakes. Just keeps chugging along with more and more anons in tow as time flows on.
Agreed to agree but disagree.
Just going off my own intiuition and observations of that event, it all seemed way to staged. I agree he is an operator, which side is anyone's guess.
I tend to follow three rules when dealing with any information or scenario:
To answer your question of why prosecute him and not Epps, the answer is simple. Optics. I believe shammy's role was to always be in the camera. Both during and post J6.
Which leads me to your last sentence. Yes, I believe his role is to paint a broad picture of anons for the normie MSM zombies.
If Chansley's role was to paint anons as violent extremists, wouldn't he have at least had verbal confrontations with the capitol police and encouraged people to misbehave like Ray Epps did?
Chansley instead just appeared to be an amiable goofball.
I never said his role was to paint us as violent. The propaganda machine already does that.
His role (assuming) was to make us look absolutely crazy and to rabble rouse while at the J6 event.
Just because he didn't do a Braveheart Freeeeeedom! scream and storm the bldg does not mean he did not lead gullible folks and unknown bad actors inside. He was to be used as a figure head, both during and after J6 because as anons, we have no face to our movement. The enemy needed an identity to attach for the cameras.
Well, we can agree to disagree on this. I think Chansley is a good guy operator and he did his job well. You think he was a bad guy operator and did his job well.
I'm not sure we will ever know the answer.
"I'm not sure we'll ever know the answer"
Agreed. Like many other aspects of happenings the past several years.
Also to consider, is that it may be completely irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Overshadowed by much more significant future occurrences down the road. Often times anons find themselves obsessing over one dig or another and truly, even if it carries relevance to "XYZ..." it won't matter say, when the momentum shifts. Shit, the past several weeks are exemplary of that. We've had so many wins, happenings, comms, FF, etc.... It's rather easy to forget or dismiss the past. Which is not wise of course, but this train has no brakes. Just keeps chugging along with more and more anons in tow as time flows on.
He is sitting in jail, though. That's a big sign, I think.