In another thread, u/Slyver replied to a discussion about political parties. In that reply was a mention of the Federal Reserve Act (FRA). I thought this subject deserved a thread of its own, rather than derailing that thread.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IYCrk69G/still-believe-in-the-right-vs-le/c/
I have long wondered the "how" part of the FRA. How did they structure it? And why did certain events happen in history that seemed to be centered around it? My research tells me this:
The FRA was the "Democrat" plan up against the "Republican" plan called the Aldrich Plan. The kicker is, they were the exact same plan.
Central banking had a long history in the USA before the FRA.
First one was in 1791, set up by Hamilton. Second one was in 1816. Third attempt was FRA in 1913, which became permanent.
It is helpful to understand the legal reasons that they had to keep re-starting it, and how they "fixed" that "problem" (from their perspective).
In the 1700's-1800's, businesses were either sole proprietorships, partnerships, or business trusts. There were very few corporations. Corporations were a creation of the king, with a special charter. Since the USA had no king, there was no mechanism for creating a corporation, or at least it was viewed as something undesirable.
The first Bank of the United States (1791), a central bank, was created as a trust. The history of trust law, going back to England, was that trusts could only last for 21 years (age of majority), or 21 years after the life of a named beneficiary.
So, they made business trusts for 20 years, a nice round number. That meant it would expire in 1811.
The fight over renewing the trust around 1810-1811 explains both the Original 13th Amendment (1810) and the War of 1812.
After the war, the second central bank was instituted in 1816. It would expire 20 years later in 1836. Just so happens that Andrew Jackson was around then, and he was anti-central banksters. This is why they tried to kill him, unsuccessfully, but his sounding the alarms and his fight against them kept the central bank away for generations following.
But around the turn of the 20th century, [they] were plotting to put in another central bank, as well as an income tax. The plan was a little more sophisticated this time.
They passed the FRA, which created the third central bank, which would again be in the form of a trust, while also passing the income tax. This trust was created in 1913, and would expire in 1933.
At the same time, they were pushing the "trust busting" narrative of anti-trust laws, using Rockefeller's Standard Oil Trust as the example. But in reality, they were shifting things behind the scenes.
The corporation is unlike the traditional business trust in that it has an unlimited life (perpetual duration, which does not expire in 20 years). While denouncing trusts as bad, they were also creating laws in states for this "new thing" called a corporation.
The Federal Reserve Trust was, indeed, owned by foreigners, which a lot of people have read about. But by the 1920's the corporation was on its way in and the business trust was on its way out.
In 1927, the Federal Reserve Trust was officially restructured as a corporation, which also had a different structure to hide who really controlled it. Key point: ownership was never important, but control always was. "Own nothing, control everything." -- John D. Rockefeller
By 1933, when the FR trust expired, it was no longer a problem because it wasn't a trust anymore, but Roosevelt unconstitutionally abused presidential powers to confiscate gold and clean up the books.
Since then, the FR has been a corporation with perpetual existence, and no longer needs Congress' approval every 20 years.
Today, the Federal Reserve is a private corporation, owned by its member banks (not individuals like the original trust). Those member banks are large banks around the country that Average Joe and Jane bank at.
But those banks don't really have any power to run the operations of the Federal Reserve. Remember: Ownership means nothing; control is everything.
The Federal Reserve -- IN THEORY -- is run by the Board of Governors, which are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. It is for this reason that normies think it is "controlled by" (or a "part of") the federal government.
But this is a deception. These people do not really run the FR. Even the chairman, currently Jerome Powell (a true idiot), does not run the FR.
The ONLY reason the FR exists, no matter what other fake claims are made, is to PRINT MONEY and make sure the INSIDERS connected to the FR can PROFIT from it.
Printing money MEANS inflating the currency, so that the newly created currency goes into the pockets of the people who created it.
If everybody THINKS there is $1,000,000 in the system, but I secretly create an extra $100,000 to put in my pocket, and everyone else just treats it like it is as real as the other money, then I have created $100,000 out of nothing but some pieces of paper. THAT is what money printing is all about.
Repeat: The ONLY purpose of ANY central bank is to PRINT MONEY, and ENRICH those who printed it. That has been going on even before the money changers figured out how to cheat via government power, rather than cheating on a small-time basis.
So, the REAL power of the Federal Reserve is the money printing. Jerome Powell does NOT do that. The Board of Governors do NOT do that. Their policies of raising and lowering the "target rate" of the Federal Funds rates and setting the Discount Rate are NOT what does it.
All of that is smoke and mirrors, no matter how many normies eat it up (even very smart normies eat it up, due to its sophistication and most normies' inability to think that it could all be a Big Con, which it is).
It is the New York Federal Reserve Bank that handles ALL "Open Market Operations," which is a euphamism for MONEY PRINTING.
The New York Fed runs ALL money printing of buying and selling pieces of paper (or today, computer digits).
This means that the New York Fed, even though it is only ONE bank in the entire system, has ALL the power of the system. Whoever runs the New York Fed is whoever prints the money at will.
Is that the President of the NY Fed? Maybe. There is a LONG list of former presidents of the NY Fed who have become Treasury Secretaries. And the president of the NY Fed is the ONLY person who has a permanent seat on the Federal Open Market Committee.
So, it could be that person. I suspect that even that person is a puppet of others behind the scenes, but if so, that would be done in a way that is never made public -- via contracts that will not see the light of day unless someone REALLY does a full audit. To do a full audit, one would likely have to dodge some bullets aimed at taking them out first. The people behind the NY Fed are the people behind the assassinations, terrorism, and so much more misery in the world.
The entire Federal Reserve System should be abolished once and for all, but this understanding of the legal structure can be helpful to understanding some of the "why did that happen" questions that people wonder about.
Come to think of it ... maybe the Federal Reserve is the Keystone.
The NY Fed, like the entire Federal Reserve System is an acting agent of the BIS. It can't be audited because it has Sovereign Immunity through the BIS. It may have Sovereign Immunity on it's own too through it's Articles of Incorporation. I still haven't looked into that but it's on my list of things to do.
Also a point of clarity.
The Board of Governors is an Advisory Board. They have no legal control whatsoever. There is no legal path of control between the actual Federal Reserve Banking system and the Government.
Also (just nitpicking), unless there is some source on JD saying it, it was Nelson Rockefeller who said,
As quoted in the World Bank investigation into crimes committed by Foundations, Trusts, and corporations..
Great post.
The Federal Reserve predates the BIS, and the BIS was never given authority over The Fed.
You're correct about the immunities of the BIS, but they don't apply to The Fed, at least on paper.
As G Edward Griffin has said: "I don't want to audit The Fed, I want to end The Fed".
Federal Reserve Banking System
It's not Federal.
There are no Reserves.
It's not a Bank.
There is no System
That the Fed predates the BIS is irrelevant. In the same way that all banks were forced to become "investors" in the Fed, even though they ALL predate the Fed, all central banks were "forced" to become investors (members AKA agents) of the BIS. All central banks are acting agents of the BIS.
There is no such thing as a Central Bank that is independent of the BIS. It is the Central Bank of the Central Banks.
The globalist banks who own the central banks created the B.I.S. They did not create an entity to rule over themselves but rather a mechanism where they could rule over others.
This is not correct unless I misinterpret the nuance in your quotes around "investors". It's more accurate to say that some banks became "customers" of the Fed. There are "member banks" and "non-member banks" and the difference matters.
I'm not downplaying the role, or the immunity, of the B.I.S. I did a whole presentation on the topic last year.
I'm just trying to help ensure the important discussion on them is as factual as possible. There are a couple of inaccuracies in this thread that probably don't matter to most readers, but the topic is important enough that I think the details matter.
My apologies for not being around the rest of the day to respond further.
The BIS is the structure of the Centralization of Authority. All Cabal systems work this way. The same people that own the BIS own the Fed. They aren't ever in opposition because they are the same entity owned and run by the same people, and always have been. However, this system has a legal structure, to ensure a Centralization of Authority. I am not talking about intentions, and I do not disagree with your statements of their intent. I am talking specifically about the legal structure of their System of Centralization of Authority.
They are forced to invest. They have no choice. All banks in the United States were required by law to buy stock in the Fed. This ensured that anyone who wasn't part of the Cabal in the banking world, or had dissension to the designs of the creators of the Fed became "members" AKA "investors" (because they were forced to buy stock) AKA subjects to the dictates of the Centralization of Authority of The Fed.
The same thing happened with the BIS, except in that case there were no dissenters because all Central Banks were already theirs. However, it also ensured there never would be dissention, through the legal structure.
You have yet to show an inaccuracy. If you have disagreements of some points, that is not evidence of an inaccuracy, but evidence of your disagreement. That is the purpose of debate. If you assume "I am right and you are wrong" then you can call your disagreement an "inaccuracy," if however you appreciate that none of us knows the Whole Truth, you can instead make your case with evidence and debate, and see how that plays out.