I saw a coffee creamer at the restaurant the other day that was labeled, "Non-dairy Creamer...Contains Milk".
So, I showed it to the waitress and said, "If you can figure this out, you probably know what a woman is.". Luckily, she laughed.
We are truly whatever our DNA says we are...the same way the creamer actually did have milk in its composition...despite its claim to be be non-dairy. A male choosing to live as a woman is a choice, not a truth. It is his presentation and marketing...his claim, like the non-dairy creamer. Still, claiming to be a woman and being one are not the same thing.
But, although it will always be a falsehood when a male claims to be a woman (because of his DNA), there are varying degrees of genetic feminine and masculine traits. So, the lie seems bigger or smaller depending on these traits, just like a non-dairy creamer can be mostly non-dairy or blatantly full of dairy.
I know. The Left enjoy wordplay. Look at all the weasely things the so-called fact checkers spout. Same with the climate scam. Someone asks you if you believe in "climate change" and you can't answer because you don't know whether they mean just man-made climate change or natural climate change.
In the case of the women's definition debate lefties seem to thrive on cognitive dissonance. I remember the advert for some LGBTQ+ themed T-shirts that extolled all the virtues of the 150 genders or however many they think we have this week. Then at the end it asked you to specify the style of fitting: M or F.
"Someone asks you if you believe in "climate change" and you can't answer because you don't know whether they mean just man-made climate change or natural climate change."
You made me think about: "What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?"
What do you mean, an African or European swallow?
I don't know that!
Haha. Perfect! So true.
Yes, and when I read Congressional legislation I notice that the titles are always beneficent, but the content is destructive.