I think this is a huge stretch and PP is sort of known for fitting stuff to prove devolution.
If it was "alternate facility" there wouldn't be just 1 is I think the most convincing argument, unless the 1 is there to obfuscate.
I do not totally discount the latter possibility, but I read this as more a "during a brief period of the kinetic part of the operation" not "for the duration of devolution." "The spill over in the streets will be quickly shut down."
I think this is a huge stretch and PP is sort of known for fitting stuff to prove devolution.
If it was "alternate facility" there wouldn't be just 1 is I think the most convincing argument, unless the 1 is there to obfuscate.
I do not totally discount the latter possibility, but I read this as more a "during a brief period of the kinetic part of the operation" not "for the duration of devolution." "The spill over in the streets will be quickly shut down."