I just ran across the Rothschilds Patent on the Covid-19 test filed in 2015 saved on my computer but don't know how to post the image without doxing myself.
You can charge the namn of a product from”generic airborn virus test kit” to “Covid 19 test kit”.
The pandemic is a big hoax (not the virus but the test methods and statistics), but this is probably one of this things that can be easily explained by a company reusing/renaming an already existing product.
When Covid 22 hits, the product will again change its name to “Covid 22 test kit”, and we will have 20+ posts like this, claiming they planned C22 in 2015 (which they probably did, but this is not a great evidence of that).
Sorry to be a party pooper, but I’m just trying to be sceptical about everything.
I don't really get what you mean... they changed the name to "Medical Test kits" AFTER people were noticing the 2018 orders.
This is archived page in 2020 (oldest archive) with orders in 2018 for COVID-19 Test kits...
So why now have they removed "COVID-19 Test kits" and replaced it with "Medical Test kits" on the current webpage? Why not just call it "Medical Test kits" in the first place? Also, why do they change it to "Medical Test kits" the very day people report that this info is here. If they have nothing to hide, WHY are they trying to hide it>?
Also notice on the changed page at the very bottom, they forgot to scrub "HS Classification Reference based on Covid-19 medical supplies list 2nd edition, prepared by World Customs Organization (WCO) and World Health Organization (WHO)
"
They probably called them medical tests kits between 2015 and 2020, C19 test kits from 2020 to now, and now back again to medical test kits until the next plandemic when they will rename them again.
I have worked a fair deal with warehouse databases, where every item has a production code /item number (not able to edit) and a product name (able to edit).
If I’m to rename one item number to a different product name today, and do an inventory from 2015, the name it had in 2015 would be changed to the current name (I just gave it).
In this case the “product code” 300215 is unchangable, while the “product description” will say w/e the name is when you create the report.
In other words, if the admin of the database changes the product description today for 300215 to “Monkey Pox test kit”, and you run a report from 2018, you’ll suddenly have 300 tons of monkey pox test kits sold to France in 2018.
All I’m saying is that this could be easily explained by database naming, and until I see a pre pandemic archive, I see this as a nothing burger.
I’ll be happy to be wrong, but I seriously think this is a dead end.
Ps. Did you intend to show me two different links? The two you linked are identical.
Also notice on the current page at the very bottom, they forgot to scrub "HS Classification Reference based on Covid-19 medical supplies list 2nd edition, prepared by World Customs Organization (WCO) and World Health Organization (WHO) "
Or they’ve renamed their product to a more generic name awaiting the next plandemic.
You can’t sell C19 test kits for Monkey pox, but you can sell “medical test kits” for monkey pox.
And if they then rename 30215 to “monkey pox test kits”, the list you’ve linked to twice will have a third name under Product description (even for 2018).
What I’m trying to say is that a historic report of shipped item will link the current product description to the product code.
If you keep the product code, but rename the product description, you’ll end up changing the report (also for historical data).
Your links clearly shows that, changing from “C19 test kits” to “medical test kits” clearly changed the product description for historical data.
What makes you think that this product hasn’t had its name changed at least one time before?
Until I see a web archived list from before the pandemic, I’m pretty sure the reason for the shipping of c19 kits prior to 2020 is because they’ve changed the description of 30215.
Yes, I understand what you are saying and I have built sql database driven sites for customers in the past and know that when you change a description it can propagate into any reports generated on the site. You are correct that just the description name change does not prove premeditation.
The name flip-flopping triggers deeper analysis and I think the part you are not seeing is the sheer quantity of “C19 test kits” distributed before 2020. There is an obvious ramping up of C19 testing capabilities pre-pandemic all across the globe. The ramping up appears to start when President DJT was elected. Only data for 2017, 2018 and 2019 is available. Is this because there was zero “medical test kits” being distributed before 2017?
2018 Quantity (the other 2 years have quantities similar to these amounts so just multiply the quantity by 3 to get the number of “C19 test kits” distributed pre-pandemic)
It could be that 30215 is the cotton swab used for testing C19 among other illnesses (they use it to test for Chlamydia as well), and was named “29176” in 2016?
We just don’t know, and it’s a huge leap to the conclusion that these test kits are the final proof of an elite pandemic conspiracy.
I am not claiming that this info is "final proof of an d-elite pandemic conspiracy". Just another thing to add to the many other coincidences like the Event 201 (high-level CORONAVIRUS pandemic exercise) put on by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The exercise happened months before the pandemic. Then there is Fauci claiming there would be a pandemic during Trumps term. Plenty more coincidences can be put on the list and it all start to paint a picture that this was all in fact planned.
You are a great de-bunker and I applaud that because leaping to conclusions based on inconclusive or missing data is never good. It would be interesting to see you put in the same kind of effort to find connections and proof if this was planned. That is probably too much to ask and too hard for you though... it is much easier to make up excuses for the d-elite agenda... right? I don't want to even imagine the poo-poo you would do to all the evidence of election tampering in 2020. (Including using the pandemic to change voting rules) I bet you have an excuse for every single incident. Are you a Defense Attorney by chance? If not, maybe you should look into a career change.
This is bullshit disinformation! …Pelosi drinks vodka
Pelosi believes in diversity and will drink anything with alcohol in it.
That would explain the hand sanitizer shortage. /s
Good one.
Yeah one of the anons dug that up last year. But thanks for posting it because many people may have missed it and I had lost the link.
All planned by big Pharma.
Sorry sauce-free rn but COVID 19 test kits and other materials existed in 2015.
I just ran across the Rothschilds Patent on the Covid-19 test filed in 2015 saved on my computer but don't know how to post the image without doxing myself.
You can charge the namn of a product from”generic airborn virus test kit” to “Covid 19 test kit”.
The pandemic is a big hoax (not the virus but the test methods and statistics), but this is probably one of this things that can be easily explained by a company reusing/renaming an already existing product.
When Covid 22 hits, the product will again change its name to “Covid 22 test kit”, and we will have 20+ posts like this, claiming they planned C22 in 2015 (which they probably did, but this is not a great evidence of that).
Sorry to be a party pooper, but I’m just trying to be sceptical about everything.
I don't really get what you mean... they changed the name to "Medical Test kits" AFTER people were noticing the 2018 orders.
This is archived page in 2020 (oldest archive) with orders in 2018 for COVID-19 Test kits...
So why now have they removed "COVID-19 Test kits" and replaced it with "Medical Test kits" on the current webpage? Why not just call it "Medical Test kits" in the first place? Also, why do they change it to "Medical Test kits" the very day people report that this info is here. If they have nothing to hide, WHY are they trying to hide it>?
Compare these,.
oldest archive -- https://web.archive.org/web/20200904035459/https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215
current site -- https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215
Also notice on the changed page at the very bottom, they forgot to scrub "HS Classification Reference based on Covid-19 medical supplies list 2nd edition, prepared by World Customs Organization (WCO) and World Health Organization (WHO) "
They probably called them medical tests kits between 2015 and 2020, C19 test kits from 2020 to now, and now back again to medical test kits until the next plandemic when they will rename them again.
I have worked a fair deal with warehouse databases, where every item has a production code /item number (not able to edit) and a product name (able to edit).
If I’m to rename one item number to a different product name today, and do an inventory from 2015, the name it had in 2015 would be changed to the current name (I just gave it).
In this case the “product code” 300215 is unchangable, while the “product description” will say w/e the name is when you create the report.
In other words, if the admin of the database changes the product description today for 300215 to “Monkey Pox test kit”, and you run a report from 2018, you’ll suddenly have 300 tons of monkey pox test kits sold to France in 2018.
All I’m saying is that this could be easily explained by database naming, and until I see a pre pandemic archive, I see this as a nothing burger.
I’ll be happy to be wrong, but I seriously think this is a dead end.
Ps. Did you intend to show me two different links? The two you linked are identical.
https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215
Also notice on the current page at the very bottom, they forgot to scrub "HS Classification Reference based on Covid-19 medical supplies list 2nd edition, prepared by World Customs Organization (WCO) and World Health Organization (WHO) "
yes I intended to send you 2 links,... the one missingis the actual current web page, not archive,. where they have removed covid19 and replaced it with "Medical Test kits" https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215
Why would they do that? Unless to cover their asses.
Or they’ve renamed their product to a more generic name awaiting the next plandemic.
You can’t sell C19 test kits for Monkey pox, but you can sell “medical test kits” for monkey pox.
And if they then rename 30215 to “monkey pox test kits”, the list you’ve linked to twice will have a third name under Product description (even for 2018).
What I’m trying to say is that a historic report of shipped item will link the current product description to the product code.
If you keep the product code, but rename the product description, you’ll end up changing the report (also for historical data).
Your links clearly shows that, changing from “C19 test kits” to “medical test kits” clearly changed the product description for historical data.
What makes you think that this product hasn’t had its name changed at least one time before?
Until I see a web archived list from before the pandemic, I’m pretty sure the reason for the shipping of c19 kits prior to 2020 is because they’ve changed the description of 30215.
Yes, I understand what you are saying and I have built sql database driven sites for customers in the past and know that when you change a description it can propagate into any reports generated on the site. You are correct that just the description name change does not prove premeditation.
The name flip-flopping triggers deeper analysis and I think the part you are not seeing is the sheer quantity of “C19 test kits” distributed before 2020. There is an obvious ramping up of C19 testing capabilities pre-pandemic all across the globe. The ramping up appears to start when President DJT was elected. Only data for 2017, 2018 and 2019 is available. Is this because there was zero “medical test kits” being distributed before 2017?
2018 Quantity (the other 2 years have quantities similar to these amounts so just multiply the quantity by 3 to get the number of “C19 test kits” distributed pre-pandemic)
8,611,830 _____ USA
12,088,700 ____ EU
9,2335,080 ____ Germany
It could be that 30215 is the cotton swab used for testing C19 among other illnesses (they use it to test for Chlamydia as well), and was named “29176” in 2016?
We just don’t know, and it’s a huge leap to the conclusion that these test kits are the final proof of an elite pandemic conspiracy.
I am not claiming that this info is "final proof of an d-elite pandemic conspiracy". Just another thing to add to the many other coincidences like the Event 201 (high-level CORONAVIRUS pandemic exercise) put on by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The exercise happened months before the pandemic. Then there is Fauci claiming there would be a pandemic during Trumps term. Plenty more coincidences can be put on the list and it all start to paint a picture that this was all in fact planned.
You are a great de-bunker and I applaud that because leaping to conclusions based on inconclusive or missing data is never good. It would be interesting to see you put in the same kind of effort to find connections and proof if this was planned. That is probably too much to ask and too hard for you though... it is much easier to make up excuses for the d-elite agenda... right? I don't want to even imagine the poo-poo you would do to all the evidence of election tampering in 2020. (Including using the pandemic to change voting rules) I bet you have an excuse for every single incident. Are you a Defense Attorney by chance? If not, maybe you should look into a career change.
Peace Out!
J