Ok help me out here. Q's first post APPEARS at least to be a very specific prediction about a very specific event that's supposed to happen less than 48 hours after that post: Hillary Clinton's arrest. That apparently didn't happen. What was it that made people continue listening to Q after that apparent failed prediction? Or do people think she WAS arrested? Was that the day they "threw her in the back of that van like a side of beef?" Did people confirm with National Guard that they had been activated in preparation for riots? What am I missing here?
*edit - Who the hell downvotes honest questions like this? I'm not even making an argument. Jesus some of you people are so fucking sensitive.
I updooted this and I'll tell you and everyone else here why.
We should ALWAYS QUESTION. Not to shill. Not to sow seeds of discontent for the purposes of division and diversion. But questioning for clarification, confirmation, or simple discussion of divergent viewpoints should not only be welcomed but vigorously defended.
The reason I follow Q is because he/she/they/it encourages logical thought. If we allow ourselves to become dogmatic automatons, we're easy pickings for the likes of the cabal.
Hm. I don't...I don't know I agree with that post. I'm a Q believer. Have been for years. But I don't really see his point from the text. Legally speaking "detained and arrested" are synonymous. Doesn't mean you're charged or held without bail, but the moment a police officer detains you, you've been arrested, so what is he claiming exactly? And where is the other poster claiming she's going to be arrested that he's replying to? I read through the whole thread--admittedly it's hard to tell who's who, but it really doesn't read the way he's claiming. Maybe my reading comprehension just sucks though.
I didn't go through the archive to find it, but he is very detailed in his work, so I'd tend to believe him. However, I'm of the opinion that the Hillary arrest post was disinformation. This is the first time I heard of this new angle on the post
Ok so maybe it's less about whether Q's predictions came true and more about Q proving that he was the insider he claimed to be? I could buy that. Because if he's an insider, nothing wrong with claiming this or that is going to happen and such and such a date if you know doing so will send the enemy flocking here or there. The idea isn't to look to Q as a prophet who predicts everything clearly and directly but rather, as someone we can trust to say what needs to be said when it needs to be said for reasons perhaps only the insider happens to know, which will be made clearer to all of us as time goes by.
The side of beef was thrown in the van on 9/11/2016, about a year prior to that particular post. If I recall correctly, the habbeningz were in Saudi Arabia: total regime change to that new guy Bin Salman. It was a "look over here! while we get you over here," move.
Ok help me out here. Q's first post APPEARS at least to be a very specific prediction about a very specific event that's supposed to happen less than 48 hours after that post: Hillary Clinton's arrest. That apparently didn't happen. What was it that made people continue listening to Q after that apparent failed prediction? Or do people think she WAS arrested? Was that the day they "threw her in the back of that van like a side of beef?" Did people confirm with National Guard that they had been activated in preparation for riots? What am I missing here?
*edit - Who the hell downvotes honest questions like this? I'm not even making an argument. Jesus some of you people are so fucking sensitive.
I updooted this and I'll tell you and everyone else here why.
We should ALWAYS QUESTION. Not to shill. Not to sow seeds of discontent for the purposes of division and diversion. But questioning for clarification, confirmation, or simple discussion of divergent viewpoints should not only be welcomed but vigorously defended.
The reason I follow Q is because he/she/they/it encourages logical thought. If we allow ourselves to become dogmatic automatons, we're easy pickings for the likes of the cabal.
Amen.
Check this post https://truthsocial.com/users/ArchiveAnon/statuses/108630418294070917
Hm. I don't...I don't know I agree with that post. I'm a Q believer. Have been for years. But I don't really see his point from the text. Legally speaking "detained and arrested" are synonymous. Doesn't mean you're charged or held without bail, but the moment a police officer detains you, you've been arrested, so what is he claiming exactly? And where is the other poster claiming she's going to be arrested that he's replying to? I read through the whole thread--admittedly it's hard to tell who's who, but it really doesn't read the way he's claiming. Maybe my reading comprehension just sucks though.
I didn't go through the archive to find it, but he is very detailed in his work, so I'd tend to believe him. However, I'm of the opinion that the Hillary arrest post was disinformation. This is the first time I heard of this new angle on the post
Ok so maybe it's less about whether Q's predictions came true and more about Q proving that he was the insider he claimed to be? I could buy that. Because if he's an insider, nothing wrong with claiming this or that is going to happen and such and such a date if you know doing so will send the enemy flocking here or there. The idea isn't to look to Q as a prophet who predicts everything clearly and directly but rather, as someone we can trust to say what needs to be said when it needs to be said for reasons perhaps only the insider happens to know, which will be made clearer to all of us as time goes by.
The side of beef was thrown in the van on 9/11/2016, about a year prior to that particular post. If I recall correctly, the habbeningz were in Saudi Arabia: total regime change to that new guy Bin Salman. It was a "look over here! while we get you over here," move.
The first post was a distraction for the deep state while the Saudi purge was happening. He basically confirmed this in subsequent drops