That's funny, I had seen reference to the "Qanoncasualties" and assumed from the start that this was typical reditards who know someone who mentioned Q and were ranting about them to cope.
That extent I'm not completely certain, I understand that in its basic sense, AI is a map of "neurons" with connections to other layers of neurons. The configuration and mapping can create different effects.
Really think about seeing someone you know in a mask, yes, eyes are key and likely does reflect in the "weights", head shape, nose bridge, eyes, lips, cheeks... the better you know someone the less of their face you would need ro see to recognize. (In this context there's a difference between X is a face and X face belongs to Y). It's that kind of pattern recognition that I think AI could pick up on.
People have done visualizations of what "motivated" the ai to one decision over another, and I have no reason to doubt that eye details have a stronger weighting, they are something of a black box where you give it input and get an output without really knowing how.
Ex; one test of an AI system found that, as far as the AI cared, the difference between a wolf and a German Shephard was.... wait for it... whether or not there was snow in the background. A wolf in the summer is a German shepherd.
This person doesn't really care about facial recognition software. He is just trying to Own Da Cons! (owndalibs except for our side).
You know this is fake as his "Q-Grandma" didn't tell him that facial recognition can see right through his muzzle.
There's not a more inorganic fake subreddit than "Qanoncasualties".
Never once in all these years have I seen one of our own jump ship to cry about it on reddit.
TMOR ---> QultHQ ---> Qanoncasualties
That's how the sub formed. Not by actual anons needing a safe space.
That's funny, I had seen reference to the "Qanoncasualties" and assumed from the start that this was typical reditards who know someone who mentioned Q and were ranting about them to cope.
Yes and no...
No in that an AI trained on maskless faces would lose accuracy.
Yes in that it wouldn't even necessarily need to be remade from scratch to learn a face with the missing data covered by a mask.
That extent I'm not completely certain, I understand that in its basic sense, AI is a map of "neurons" with connections to other layers of neurons. The configuration and mapping can create different effects.
Really think about seeing someone you know in a mask, yes, eyes are key and likely does reflect in the "weights", head shape, nose bridge, eyes, lips, cheeks... the better you know someone the less of their face you would need ro see to recognize. (In this context there's a difference between X is a face and X face belongs to Y). It's that kind of pattern recognition that I think AI could pick up on.
People have done visualizations of what "motivated" the ai to one decision over another, and I have no reason to doubt that eye details have a stronger weighting, they are something of a black box where you give it input and get an output without really knowing how.
Ex; one test of an AI system found that, as far as the AI cared, the difference between a wolf and a German Shephard was.... wait for it... whether or not there was snow in the background. A wolf in the summer is a German shepherd.
I wonder what it's going to take for people like this to admit they were wrong.
Well, for many, we have seen that the death of a close family member (up to and including their child) is not enough.
Honestly I do wish that morons of this magnitude would just die off already.