The stars in the NASA photo are sus. I have a lens for an old film camera that will make light sources look like the flairing stars. It's due to crosshatching on the lens. The thing is, though, it will make all light sources flair, not just certain ones.
Yes. I remember the article that came with the poster. They, Johns Hopkins and NaSa were working on the Hubble at that time and claimed the picture was from the Large Space Telescope from the ground hence why the 'photo was so fuzzy. This lead to more funding for the Hubble program supposedly to get better quality photos and images of stars and galaxies.
They took photos of the same exact parts of the skies with the newer telescope. So some of the pictures are duplicates of Hubble photos, but with far more detail and clarity. The original photos are in infrared, so these are all artistic renditions to a degree. At least that's my understanding, but don't quote me on this.
Just because someone lies doesnβt mean that other liars are right.
Look at it this way: If a republican lies and gets caught in corruption, it doesnβt automatically mean, democrats are honest people who tell the truth.
Both are shit, just like nasa and flat earthers.
The stars in the NASA photo are sus. I have a lens for an old film camera that will make light sources look like the flairing stars. It's due to crosshatching on the lens. The thing is, though, it will make all light sources flair, not just certain ones.
NASA is pulling a fast one on us, methinks.
I just took a look and I found the exact same photo of the background -- and I mean exact. It's #6 in the slideshow here:
https://www.9news.com.au/world/nasa-space-photos-stars-planets/2e460bc9-fea4-4243-93cc-95d7a1e52745#6
Either the school photo has been shopped, or we're being taken for a ride by NASA.
Yes! I used to have this poster on my wall as a kid. It came from an Omni Magazine centerfold around 1983. π
Are you serious?
Yes. I remember the article that came with the poster. They, Johns Hopkins and NaSa were working on the Hubble at that time and claimed the picture was from the Large Space Telescope from the ground hence why the 'photo was so fuzzy. This lead to more funding for the Hubble program supposedly to get better quality photos and images of stars and galaxies.
Here you go. It is called "Webb's first deep field." https://www.etsy.com/listing/1267468749/webbs-first-deep-field-poster-james-webb
Obvious time lapse smearing of many of the pink objects.
u/WeekoWolf
Aghh! This isn't an old photo. After further review, the etsy photo is from the new telescope, supposedly. This same vendor is selling another poster:
https://www.etsy.com/listing/1266997655/james-webb-space-telescope-poster-cosmic?click_key=fb090d0747eb7a8340bb809ee0798cb59e351b67%3A1266997655&click_sum=59e7956e&ref=related-1&pro=1&frs=1
"πJuly 12, 2022 poster of the first images of the james webb space telescope."π
The question then becomes, how did they get posters so quickly if the photos were just released??
To me, this particular photo looks like an artist's rendering. It doesn't look real.
Ho Lee Fook! it IS the same photo! We are being taken for a ride.
Excellent work, fren!
Here you go. It is called "Webb's first deep field." https://www.etsy.com/listing/1267468749/webbs-first-deep-field-poster-james-webb
Obvious time lapse smearing of many of the pink objects.
Getting a 429 error now on your link fren.
They took photos of the same exact parts of the skies with the newer telescope. So some of the pictures are duplicates of Hubble photos, but with far more detail and clarity. The original photos are in infrared, so these are all artistic renditions to a degree. At least that's my understanding, but don't quote me on this.
I ran the background through Tineye and the oldest photo it came up with is from July 11th, 2022, not that this necessarily proves anything.
They have scrubbed many of the doctored photos since that time. I did find a site with some of what they call Hubble space photos..
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/multimedia/index.html
They would have had to scrub them -- and they apparently did, as I'm sure something would have popped up on Tineye.
Excellent work, fren! We caught them red-handed.
Does this mean the earth is flat?
No, it means NASA is a fraud.
Right. I get that. So, is it possible, then that the flat-earthers are right?
No, not possible.
Just because someone lies doesnβt mean that other liars are right.
Look at it this way: If a republican lies and gets caught in corruption, it doesnβt automatically mean, democrats are honest people who tell the truth. Both are shit, just like nasa and flat earthers.
Why would the earth be flat, but the sun, and every planet that any amateur with a good telescope can see is spherical.