there are plenty of far out conspiracy sites for you to talk about stuff that has no basis in existing facts. This site is for Qspiracy.
The interesting thing about Qspiracy is that we're looking at the published media since Q couldn't divulge info due to national security. Q is saying, you don't need access to deep intel - just read the media with an open and searching eye and you'll find their inconsistencies and cover-ups and this will often reveal the real narrative. That's the thing that unites us on this site.
The Bible, as Q refers to it, is about the Bible as everyone knows it, not as deep conspiracy heads know it. Aliens, DNA, etc. are all wonderful if you like flights of fancy with no basis in existing knowledge and theories. And yes, I've seen it all although it was hard going as it lacks any consistency and logic (Sitchin, Von Daniken etc. etc.) There's enough in the current verifiable theories of the Bible as it is to keep one researching and digging.
exactly. And the word of the foremost scholars helps too. The best help you understand the translation in context. The mistake made by a lot of these crackpots is that they interpret things from a modern world view in total ignorance of the cultural norms of the time.
Well as a crackpot can I say I don't think a transcendental omnipotent omnipresent God would force you to hand over your first born to put through the fire..nor to be drinking six litres of fortified wine a day...nor demanding house of Jacob kill every man woman and child .when invading occupied lands ..nor forcing circumsion to tag his own!!
it's ok not to understand anything about the Bible, as these ideas you've quoted suggest. They are often referred to by people who don't understand the text and don't want to engage with the idea of an omnipotent being existing at all - no hate, by all means, it's a matter of choice. But wouldn't you want to know about it better before inventing ideas that simply cannot align with its premise?
there are plenty of far out conspiracy sites for you to talk about stuff that has no basis in existing facts. This site is for Qspiracy.
The interesting thing about Qspiracy is that we're looking at the published media since Q couldn't divulge info due to national security. Q is saying, you don't need access to deep intel - just read the media with an open and searching eye and you'll find their inconsistencies and cover-ups and this will often reveal the real narrative. That's the thing that unites us on this site.
The Bible, as Q refers to it, is about the Bible as everyone knows it, not as deep conspiracy heads know it. Aliens, DNA, etc. are all wonderful if you like flights of fancy with no basis in existing knowledge and theories. And yes, I've seen it all although it was hard going as it lacks any consistency and logic (Sitchin, Von Daniken etc. etc.) There's enough in the current verifiable theories of the Bible as it is to keep one researching and digging.
That's your interpretation...to research the Bible and see clearly the mistakes in it etc you need an old Hebrew Bible and the translation.
exactly. And the word of the foremost scholars helps too. The best help you understand the translation in context. The mistake made by a lot of these crackpots is that they interpret things from a modern world view in total ignorance of the cultural norms of the time.
Well as a crackpot can I say I don't think a transcendental omnipotent omnipresent God would force you to hand over your first born to put through the fire..nor to be drinking six litres of fortified wine a day...nor demanding house of Jacob kill every man woman and child .when invading occupied lands ..nor forcing circumsion to tag his own!!
But that's just me! Crackpot as you say
it's ok not to understand anything about the Bible, as these ideas you've quoted suggest. They are often referred to by people who don't understand the text and don't want to engage with the idea of an omnipotent being existing at all - no hate, by all means, it's a matter of choice. But wouldn't you want to know about it better before inventing ideas that simply cannot align with its premise?