Can someone answer this question? If Roe v. Wade was unconstitutional, how could a law declaring the same federal powers be constitutional? An act of Congress cannot trump the Constitution.
This is probably unconstitutional due to it not being an enumerated power of the federal government. Though there is some grey area that I'm not smart enough to explain, this has nothing to do with regulating interstate commerce. So likely it fails on those grounds. States could easily nullify this, it'll end up in court, and eventually gets struck by SCOTUS.
Can someone answer this question? If Roe v. Wade was unconstitutional, how could a law declaring the same federal powers be constitutional? An act of Congress cannot trump the Constitution.
This is probably unconstitutional due to it not being an enumerated power of the federal government. Though there is some grey area that I'm not smart enough to explain, this has nothing to do with regulating interstate commerce. So likely it fails on those grounds. States could easily nullify this, it'll end up in court, and eventually gets struck by SCOTUS.
This is going to play out for years to come.
...obfuscation....