Way too much DS comms about nukes and fallout and apocalypse.
They would want it too, since nuclear winter combats global warming, right? R-rright?
Way too much DS comms about nukes and fallout and apocalypse.
They would want it too, since nuclear winter combats global warming, right? R-rright?
Uh...reality trumps analysis any day. I did analysis for a career, and there is no credibility to fantasy. Nagasaki was hit by an atomic bomb. There's no getting around that FACT. The same kind of bomb that was set off at Trinity site. I have the evidence in both cases.
You have a problem. You would believe a line of bullshit over the deaths of thousands. What a despicable trivialization of those lives. Just so you can have a head trip. You are the sort of person that brings down the level of this page.
My point was that reality has physical evidence. There were no firebombs. The devastation was not simply conflagration. Trinity was not a firebomb. (Do you even know what trinitite is?) I am just calling out fools who are deluded into denying reality. You are the ones who think reality is subjective.
You didn't hear my father's description of what he saw, nor were you there to see it with him, so you have no standing to judge the sobriety of his account, or accuse him of triviality.
I can believe that you think the opinions of others are nothing. Along with their evidence and testimony. You are imprisoned in your own bubble of falsehood. That is, indeed, what makes us different.
Typical. No rational response. Haul out the snide insult and prove to me, once again, how someone retreats from the field.