That was determined in the aftermath of the Nuremberg trials if I understand it's correctly.
But they frame it as "we gave you a choice (work here or not,)" and that seems to be holding up in court.
Freedom of religion of course is the 1st amendment and may have a better chance of prevailing in court.
I was hoping someone with more knowledge might point to something working its way to the supreme court.
We keep the faith that someone can peirce the shield and make these SOBs pay and then pay some more.
Human experimentation without consent is illegal no?
That was determined in the aftermath of the Nuremberg trials if I understand it's correctly. But they frame it as "we gave you a choice (work here or not,)" and that seems to be holding up in court. Freedom of religion of course is the 1st amendment and may have a better chance of prevailing in court. I was hoping someone with more knowledge might point to something working its way to the supreme court. We keep the faith that someone can peirce the shield and make these SOBs pay and then pay some more.