https://www.howbadismybatch.com/cdcexpiry3.pdf
Why do other batches have no expiry date? Why do the batches with expiry date happen to be the deadly ones? Why does CDC want to keep this list a secret?
The reason is that the batches which contain the mRNA vaccines are the ones that would expire. The batches with the saline are the ones that don't need an expiry date.
Does it mean all the batches other than the deadly ones were actually Saline?
Most of the humanity is actually safe?
"I know about cell biology (which is not insubstantial)."
"How exactly did I present myself as such [an authority of some sort]? I presented an argument. That is not speaking from authority, but presenting an argument."
You are a wiki schooled academic-style equivocator who wants to have it both ways. "I know my cell bio, just don't mistake me for speaking authoritatively when I also say, ' I can tell people that I have seen no evidence to support it (despite having done my due diligence), and in my decades of experience, lipids of this nature do not pose a threat.'"
Oh really? And, if true, by what route(s) of administration is this true - or didn't Wikipedia happen to say? And if true, in the presence of what other formulated substances is this true – or don’t you know or want to know, because you let yourself be jabbed with a host of other [undisclosed] substances to keep your job (whose cellular penetration is facilitated and whose activity(s) are possibly co-enhanced in the presence of SM-102) that are percolating through your brain right now. Still an irrelevant consideration?
Your narratives continue to evidence the fact that you have absolutely no accomplishment or understanding of basic pharmaceutical development, hence you are flailing about waving your hands and screaming "irrelevant!" at every point you do not have the intellectual capacity to comprehend. Having identified no relevant experience you persoannly have in either biological or pharmaceutical formulary development you’re clearly out of your league in this discussion in spite of all the verbiage you have thrown at it. Example:
Re: 10% SM-102/90% EtOH: “I can't find that anywhere on her list of things, but even if true (and it could be, because I think ethanol would likely be a viable solvent), pure ethanol, is toxic as fuck..”. Research Grade SM-102 (Cayman Chemicals) https://www.caymanchem.com/news/sm-102-statement Simple enough to look up and verify in 10 seconds – if you know where to look and how to do basic research.
“Do you have a reason to suspect it is other than that "biology is complicated" and "you never know until you do the science"? Because that is all I'm hearing from you.”
That is all I need to say. It is incumbent upon you to justify your safety claims (not just what you’ve read in Wiki and have parroted on the board): it is not incumbent upon me to do the science for you. All substances administered (particularly those administered by injection) must demonstrate their satisfactory safety profile through formulation integrity studies, stability/degradation profiling (according to PubMed there are possibly as many as 75 different related substances for SM-102 alone – which ones does your Moderna jab have in it, in what proportions and how are they limited synthetically?), physiologic/metabolic fates studies, and tissue depositon studies to allow for legitimate consideration for use in pharmaceutical or biologic applications. This was not adequately done for any CV19 jabs.
I do not apologize for the fact that I happen to have 40-years of career achievements and patents in pharmaceutical and biologic therapeutics development, which also happen to include having served at one time as a Review Chemist at the FDA, and having completed with distinction 4 academic undergraduate and graduate degree programs, 3 of which are in the natural sciences of biology, chemistry and biochemistry.
You wrote a clearly butt-hurt soliloquy about when one speaks of experience gained through their academics and their profession, but when you turn around and write, "I know about cell biology (which is not insubstantial),” it quickly becomes painfully obvious to readers that whatever you think you know about cell biology is somewhat less than billed and that you are substantially out of your depth on these topics - particularly with respect to your feigned “expertise” as it pertains to your unmerited certainty regarding presumed safety of SM-102 as co-formulated with undisclosed substances in injectibles.
Based upon the way you reason and write, it would come as no surprise to me to learn that the sum of your "decades of experience" is actually as a part-time Moderna summer intern, driving a pallet mover in the warehouse on 3rd shift.