The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building
Look up Institute of Northern Engineering. This is the most recent study that i know of. I think most think the NIST stuff is just silly. As far as sound, who knows what kind of explosives we have quietly developed. I don't know how else you get "the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building". I don't know how they took down these buildings, but I know the BS story the fake news and NIST has been peddling is just that. BS. It ranks up there with the covid hoax.
Is that how you think damaged buildings fall?
It's how a lot of us watched it
I don't think it was silent.
I've seen videos of interviews with fireman who attested to hearing a series of explosions just prior to the collapse of building 7.
The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building
Look up Institute of Northern Engineering. This is the most recent study that i know of. I think most think the NIST stuff is just silly. As far as sound, who knows what kind of explosives we have quietly developed. I don't know how else you get "the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building". I don't know how they took down these buildings, but I know the BS story the fake news and NIST has been peddling is just that. BS. It ranks up there with the covid hoax.