A HUGE win for free speech
(stevekirsch.substack.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
But isn't "attorney general" together describing one subject, of which there are two (attorney general x 2 = 2 attorney generals)? This would be a good trick question on the ole grammar quiz.
You singularize and pluralize well!
KEK
Okay, I'll take a shot at this. I think it is attorneys general because the attorneys function in some general form. Could be wrong, but that makes sense to me
LawProse Lesson #262: The plural of “attorney general.”
What’s the plural of attorney general? The answer is attorneys general, not *attorney generals. (The asterisk signifies an always-erroneous form.)
A one-time alleged editor of the Harvard Law Review totally failed this easy test.