You can see all these corrupt judges doing the same thing. During pre-trial, they ask the prosecution all these difficult “what if” scenarios as if they are trying to protect the defendant’s rights but shave off all the minor decisions that would have helped the defendant. By the time the jury hears opening statements, the verdict has already been determined by limiting the defendant’s ability to defend themselves. 🦘 🦘
did anyone honestly expect a different outcome?
You can see all these corrupt judges doing the same thing. During pre-trial, they ask the prosecution all these difficult “what if” scenarios as if they are trying to protect the defendant’s rights but shave off all the minor decisions that would have helped the defendant. By the time the jury hears opening statements, the verdict has already been determined by limiting the defendant’s ability to defend themselves. 🦘 🦘