Sudden heart attacks now to be blamed on (shuffle cards)… shower habits🤡🌍
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
As a devout Christian , I do not put a lot of stock into Darwins Theory. But, the clot shot is thinning out our species and only those whose brain evolved into critical thinking will survive. So maybe, God's plan included a little Darwinism in it.
Perhaps Darwin is credited with merely noticing a pattern that God created? Everything we see and everything we don't see is his work. His systems are all working as intended and are all incredibly marvelous. We see everything with a limited field of view, we don't have the ability to understand or even comprehend all that is. That is where Faith comes in. We trust in his plan and his creation.
To some degree, this is true,(Linnaeus saw many of connections) but Darwin took it too far. We grant that all humans (with the exception of two) came from one cell, but that one cell is distinctly human. We still haven't found any true 'missing links' and we are only beginning to see how truly complex even a simple cell is. Michael Behe's Darwin's Black Box, though detailed and sometimes complicated, is one of the best reads for the not so scientifically inclined. (You can skip the overly detailed points in the book) You may also appreciate reading Zombie Science by Johnathan Wells, which explains the missing link problems and how other so-called 'evidence for evolution' that keeps recycling is at best flawed and at worst deceptive.
The Theory of Evolution is distinctly different from Natural selection. If I remember correctly, even Darwin didn't believe humans evolved from single cell organisms toward the end of his life. The simple truth is that the theory of evolution is a possible hypothesis and it is unproven, the problem with this is that it is taught as fact.
The more evidence we obtain, the less the evidence points in the direction of macroevolution. The irreducible complexity of the cell, along with the requirement of processes to devolve before proceeding, makes Darwin's theory pretty much unworkable without some major adjustments, as a group of scientists pointed out . One hundred scientists from a variety of scientific fields, including Nobel nominee Henry F. Schaefer, the third most cited chemist, questioned the ability of random mutation to create life. "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutations and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
MIchael Behe, Johnathan Wells, and other scientists who hold to Intelligent Design theory have no problem with micro-evolution (the idea that things evolve within specific limits) but macro-evolution takes the idea way too far.
Science explains how. Religion explains why.
Science tries to, but hasn't gotten there yet. Life is too complex for us at this point in human understanding.
Precisely. That sums it up perfectly.
So why did he create the current situation? To test us?
The bible tells us that the enemy comes to kill, steal, and destroy and that’s exactly what they’re doing. God never creates disorder, but instead destroys the plans of the enemy as we partner with him, recognizing our authority over evil as his sons and daughters.
We need more followers of Jesus to wake up and authoritatively (by his power) bind and destroy the enemy as we see it.
…and what a privilege it is…
Predestination vs free will. I believe in the latter.
To be honest, I believe in both, but that our free will is limited by both circumstance (the natural limits we have on what we are able to do) and both our and God's choices.
he didnt the devil did ....
Here's a review video of a Sony Aibo Robot Dog -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8t8fyiiQVZ0
Compare what owning this Robot Dog would be like in comparison to a real puppy.
Sure, the Robot Dog won't shit and piss on the floor like the puppy will before it's housebroken, or eat that pair of your favorite slippers because you didn't realize puppies teethe and you need to pay more attention to its needs. The Robot Dog will obey all of your commands as long as you keep its battery charged. Meanwhile, the puppy might disobey your command even after you spent hours getting it to learn the command in the first place.
If you put in the time and effort, one day that puppy will become a dog who obeys your commands, doesn't eat your slippers, no longer has accidents, and who can still surprise you from time to time.
Which dog's love would you value more? The Robot Dog's or the real dog's love? Is the Robot Dog ever going to surprise you by exhibiting a new behavior it wasn't programmed to, barring a malfunction, of course?
Similarly, how many movies and books are based on the premise of a rich person who hides his wealth to test if a woman loves him for real and not simply because of his money?
Hopefully these analogies helps you understand WHY the Creator gave us free will.
From my estimation, He didn't want a bunch of robots who were incapable of independent thought. He wants his creation to love Him and praise Him because they choose to do so, not because they're programmed to or simply because they see the transaction as their meal ticket.
The problem with dogs is they aren't made to last. You are lucky to get 12 years out of the larger varieties before they stop working. (Can I blame the Creator for that?) I want my money back!
They were, once... Devolution ruined all that. Think of it as a perfectly functional system, then an enemy slipped in malware. Now all creation is looking for the restoration to the original design specifications, and that has cost the designer plenty to repair. The book of Romans will explain the details for you.
Sadly, the cabal is selecting for those of us with an operational brain. Of course they want their premier slaves to be the brightest and most productive.
Their NPC minions are disposable once they have served their purpose.
I'm OK with the idiots taking themselves out, but I am certain that the slavemasters are confident in their ability to control us.
The cabal are confident in their superiority. They honestly believe they are better than us. They see us no differently than we see third worlders
Natural selection will naturally strengthen a species, and you can believe that along with any spiritual belief. Believing that natural selection will lead to new species arising from old ones is a whole other thing, and that is a matter of faith. We observe species disappearing, but we don't see new kinds of creatures appearing.