You are making allegations without evidence. What is a "prop rock"? That's what you are declaring what you see, not evidence of it being unauthentic. Same thing about a "backdrop." What makes the background view a "backdrop"? The fact that it doesn't change with time? Gee, that is sort of what happens in a largely stationary environment: not much happens.

The "moondoggie" page is just a reading assignment. I looked at the first article. No images. No interest in wasting my time because you can't make a point for yourself.

An atmosphere on the Moon? If you think so, you are truly ignorant. It is vacuum. Rocket exhaust has nothing to push around, and it expands very rapidly once out of the nozzle, so there is no problem with small rocks not being moved. (There is some streaking radiating from where the exhaust did impinge.) The first time landing the LEM did not fail (there was an interval that the guidance program had to work through before touchdown, and this was known by both the astronauts and ground control). Space suits were in use since the Mercury flights.

I say you need to learn some science before you see "evidence" that is only your own misunderstanding or ignorance.