If this is even true I wonder if the age line was skewed or hidden from sample group. Some people do not equate a pedo harming a 17 yr old as the same as an infant. Legal age varies per state. It was 15 not to long ago in MO.

I know a baby and a 15 yr old is far cry from one another, but I only used that to set this up. Both are only called " sexual offenders ", but at what age / point can we call the person insane and permanently remove them from society ?

We know they are both pedophiles, but people have different lines depending on their own and if they even have a moral compass. And in that regard we know dems are allover the place.

They just run with the herd and if it sounds righteous they blindly jump onboard without any thought behind it. Actually it seems the more degenerate it is, the more they're on board w/ it. Remember - they are taught " not to judge " their whole lives.

I could easily see them getting this to 75% if the sample was taken in San Fran for instance. So there is always that trick. Control sample group and u control the results.

Just thought I'd add that factor to this thread since it seems some people ( not us ) are in the gray area according to that AT article.