I think that's a big, but not all, part of it, yes. There's no escaping the fact that outside of metropolitan centres, gays are far less promiscuous and polysexual, because the opportunity simply isn't there, for one, and two, when you don't live in that milieu, other things take priority in life like your home, family, career, hobbies etc than sex. I'd guess that'd go for straights too in a broad general sense.
But what's missing to make infection rates so different in cities? I don't know enough or have not yet seen enough research to have a decisive opinion on that one. However, what I do know is that the epicentre of the whole AIDS thing was always SF, where hedonistic life hasn't changed much to this day.
And thank you for being prepared to talk about the subject rationally and objectively, it really is appreciated. I purposely put 'communities' in speech marks because I can't stand the term and the way it attempts to put me in a box.
Indeed. And remember how just over two years ago, an outbreak of a disease in Wuhan, that Italian city, and NYC, became the otherwise invisible 'pandemic'. Just an observation!
As a straight and former liberal former ally who used to donate and feed you gays, what you just said is an absolute lie. AIDS was and is a thing outside large liberal cities. You just prefer to live near them because in addition to consuming semen and ass, you're the world's biggest consumers of mindless product - quiche, brunch, exotic coffee XYZ, kale flavored dog supplements, this flashy belt, that flashy pouch, these vegan pleather shoes, those hair gels and primp and pout and pluck items. So you like to be near them, the clubs, and endless "boyth".
I think that's a big, but not all, part of it, yes. There's no escaping the fact that outside of metropolitan centres, gays are far less promiscuous and polysexual, because the opportunity simply isn't there, for one, and two, when you don't live in that milieu, other things take priority in life like your home, family, career, hobbies etc than sex. I'd guess that'd go for straights too in a broad general sense.
But what's missing to make infection rates so different in cities? I don't know enough or have not yet seen enough research to have a decisive opinion on that one. However, what I do know is that the epicentre of the whole AIDS thing was always SF, where hedonistic life hasn't changed much to this day.
And thank you for being prepared to talk about the subject rationally and objectively, it really is appreciated. I purposely put 'communities' in speech marks because I can't stand the term and the way it attempts to put me in a box.
It’s a media myth that conservatives are racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. it’s the left that are all those things, simply projection.
I never made that connection. Interesting observation!
Indeed. And remember how just over two years ago, an outbreak of a disease in Wuhan, that Italian city, and NYC, became the otherwise invisible 'pandemic'. Just an observation!
As a straight and former liberal former ally who used to donate and feed you gays, what you just said is an absolute lie. AIDS was and is a thing outside large liberal cities. You just prefer to live near them because in addition to consuming semen and ass, you're the world's biggest consumers of mindless product - quiche, brunch, exotic coffee XYZ, kale flavored dog supplements, this flashy belt, that flashy pouch, these vegan pleather shoes, those hair gels and primp and pout and pluck items. So you like to be near them, the clubs, and endless "boyth".
Tell the truth. We're not all stupid here.
Go back to reddit.