What is this thread all about?
Just a place for general discussion. A place to unload whats on your mind and talk about anything - personal, health, help needed, achievements, daily highs and daily lows, theories, predictions and what have you.
Does not need to be Q related.
I stated my journey with the Bonfire guy's "Great Awakening". Whichever you introduce, preface it with "No one knows exactly how things are going behind the scenes, this is the best Anons put together at the time, but we have better understanding now"
Also, it might be a good idea to start with redpilling in specific areas. For finance, it would be Catherine Fitts Austin's Planet Lockdown
For medicine I would suggest Murder by injection
For FBI, Ted Gunderson
And when they are ready, you can introduce them to the "Fall of Cabal" series.
Starting on part 2 might work? I mean, you don't need part 1 to look at part 2, it just helps. I wish I knew what the problem was, maybe I could fix it. I admit that part 1 is a little too "stock market"y. I'd like to find a broader introduction that fits.
As for the mutual fund stuff, if he doesn't like it, its not that important. Seeing and understanding the heat maps are really the only important part of Part 1.
As for Q stuff, I don't know. That's not the type of stuff I show people. Personally I got my Q start after finding the original Fall of the Cabal.
Was there some specific point he took objection to? I can certainly fine tune any argument if that needs to be done.
I appreciate your pain. My wife is in the field of academic research in public health. It is difficult to work past that brainwashing. She sees a lot now, but she keeps reverting back to her training and the beliefs of her coworkers. She still has some level of "trust" for the system that she works for. Like, she is at the point now where she appreciates their might be some fuckery, but it can't be that bad.
It was a long road just to get here. If you are patient, it will happen.
I was really hoping my work would help someone like your husband, with specific knowledge of the topic. It is disconcerting that it fell on deaf ears there. It means my argument could have been made better, though I'm not sure how.
Maybe future parts will be a better introduction. Part 6 I think will be especially eye opening as I show how the pharmaceutical/medicine/education system was created.
However, if he can't even make it to Part 5 (or even to the heat maps), Part 6 would be a terrible introduction. It is meant to be progressive. If you can't accept the beginning as even possible, nothing after can even be seen; the cognitive dissonance is just too great.
Counterprogramming is hard! :)