What is this thread all about?
Just a place for general discussion. A place to unload whats on your mind and talk about anything - personal, health, help needed, achievements, daily highs and daily lows, theories, predictions and what have you.
Does not need to be Q related.
Was there some specific point he took objection to? I can certainly fine tune any argument if that needs to be done.
I appreciate your pain. My wife is in the field of academic research in public health. It is difficult to work past that brainwashing. She sees a lot now, but she keeps reverting back to her training and the beliefs of her coworkers. She still has some level of "trust" for the system that she works for. Like, she is at the point now where she appreciates their might be some fuckery, but it can't be that bad.
It was a long road just to get here. If you are patient, it will happen.
I was really hoping my work would help someone like your husband, with specific knowledge of the topic. It is disconcerting that it fell on deaf ears there. It means my argument could have been made better, though I'm not sure how.
Maybe future parts will be a better introduction. Part 6 I think will be especially eye opening as I show how the pharmaceutical/medicine/education system was created.
However, if he can't even make it to Part 5 (or even to the heat maps), Part 6 would be a terrible introduction. It is meant to be progressive. If you can't accept the beginning as even possible, nothing after can even be seen; the cognitive dissonance is just too great.
Counterprogramming is hard! :)
I had put in the Mutual Fund thing as an addendum long after writing the report. I see now it disrupts the flow, and prevents people from getting to the really important information as quickly as possible. I need to move that and give it a TL;DR. Thank you for brining this to my attention.
Well, if you ask him to look at it again, I have taken that part, moved it to a better position, and put in a TLDR which explains better exactly what I am looking at in the funds (stock ownership and not "investment opportunities"). It flows much more smoothly into the first "shocker" which is that all of the corporations own each other, i.e. stock ownership is completely irrelevant, which should shock the shit out of him.
It was a mistake and careless for me to put the fund stuff there. I wasn't thinking about the overall flow and the necessity of getting to the shocker info (the hook) asap (which was how it was originally designed).