The Court was tasked with deciding if a law in MS was constitutional or not. You may still disagree that that law in MS is unconstitutional and the court got it wrong but you cant argue that the decision itself was unconstitutional as they had the jurisdiction to make it. Has this idiot ever read Marbury vs Madison?
The Court was tasked with deciding if a law in MS was constitutional or not. You may still disagree that that law in MS is unconstitutional and the court got it wrong but you cant argue that the decision itself was unconstitutional as they had the jurisdiction to make it. Has this idiot ever read Marbury vs Madison?