It could technically be true but its a short sighted view (which happens alot in science). Cooking food (and going out in the sun) solves more problems than it creates.
Im now inherently skeptical of any cancer studies, they are almost never verified, are based on uncontrolled data review, and just the delay from events to diagnosis eliminates the observation part of the event.
Yes, carbonized meat can be carcinogenic or so it's commonly believed.
The interesting thing is how much they flip flop on the degree, and ultimately seem to have decided to tackle the problem from multiple directions at once by saying that all red meat causes it too
Is this like the “study” that basically showed cooking meat causes cancer? Either implying people shouldnt cook their food or eat meat.
It could technically be true but its a short sighted view (which happens alot in science). Cooking food (and going out in the sun) solves more problems than it creates.
Im now inherently skeptical of any cancer studies, they are almost never verified, are based on uncontrolled data review, and just the delay from events to diagnosis eliminates the observation part of the event.
Yes, carbonized meat can be carcinogenic or so it's commonly believed.
The interesting thing is how much they flip flop on the degree, and ultimately seem to have decided to tackle the problem from multiple directions at once by saying that all red meat causes it too