Its obvious AF from the Judge's own social media that she perceives Jones as a political enemy and can be argued that she would unfairly rule.
The issue with Alex's phone records being given to prosecutors "mistakenly" sounds like a load of shit and will expose illegal actions by prosecutors (as has been seen several times over the last couple years - Rittenhouse?)
Appeals guaranteed.
This is another way to wake people up to the all-encompassing corruption. Sure, a few retards are foaming at the mouth like rabid dogs over the obviously gross persecution, but the whole trial is a farce show being run by clowns against a man who wields the truth.
The conclusion of this farce will not follow their script, I think.
how strongly do you believe this on scale 1-100
How strongly do you believe Q's own words:
(Q post # 2089)
Q straight up said AJ (Alex Jones and his associates) are Mossad backed.
The look into Q post #1865 where Q says "Actors will act". (He calls AJ an actor).
1 being "I didn't bother to look into it.
and 99 being "I knew Alex as Bill Hicks" ?
Where do you stand on the scale?