The wife is no more correct in what she did than the pharmacist. But the pharmacist saying she wasn't the one who gave the shot without the husband even telling her exactly when the shot was administered does not hold water. The only way that pharmacist could be certain she didn't jab the child is if she's not jabbed any child.
She denied being the pharmacist that gave the shot without knowing the exact date/time the child was injected. Denial isn't going to work.
Yes, the only way that could be true is if she had missed the last two weeks or so, she didn't claim that.
The wife is no more correct in what she did than the pharmacist. But the pharmacist saying she wasn't the one who gave the shot without the husband even telling her exactly when the shot was administered does not hold water. The only way that pharmacist could be certain she didn't jab the child is if she's not jabbed any child.