It has never been isolated because its a 'virus'. No virus has ever been isolated in the entire history of Virology. Furthermore, in the history of medicine, not one published study shows the isolation of identical particles that would represent a disease-causing virus from any body fluid from any sick person. The virus theory is only a working theory that has been accepted by the scientific community at large. Even former Pfizer VP of Research, Dr. Michael Yeadon after reviewing the research of Dr. Thomas Cowan now believes respiratory viruses do not exist.
There are many clues that tell us 'something' sinister is afoot with all these new 'viruses' the CDC announces each year. One such clue is that all synthetic pharmaceutical drugs compromise the immune system. If health is a real concern to Big Pharma then why isn't this important criterion mitigated in drugs? Secondly, why is there so much emphasis from the medical industry that our immune systems are inherently defective and thus, we need to all get vax☠xinated? Why is Natural immunity trivialized when our long history tells us it's the most important thing that got us here today in the first place? Why is the well established fact of good sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition for preventing the spread of diseases attacked by fact checkers on search engines? It's mind boggling if you think about this. This has been the requirement for every medical hospital for treating patients from the very beginning. Why wouldn't the same practice be used in society everywhere?
The Smithsonian Institute is not reputable when it comes to actual history and artifacts. They have single-handedly disappeared thousands of pieces of historical evidence all over America. So to me, the Smithsonian isn't a reputable authority on anything they print.
I think Dr. Michael Yeadon, who reviewed the evidence provided him from Dr. Tom Cowan is a good example of his academic education being based on secondary sources. This is actually quite common in many academic disciplines. Someone will source their 'findings' based on someone's study, which is sourced on someone else's study. It is equivalent to the barrel of monkey game. However, the primary source is never reviewed and verified.
No one has researched the primary sources like Dr. Cowan has. The entire virology field is based on sloppy fraudulent work. Then on top of this, other virologists used this to further their published work. Dr. Cowen exposes these unrepeatable clinical studies as shams. He shows this in an incontrovertible method and makes it clear to anyone. And look at the results when this primary sourced information was provided to Dr. Yeadon. Yeadon was blown away and realized he was misled in believing viruses existed.
Our natural immune system is king and dictates the quality of life. The virus was invented to scare people. It is the perfect Bogeyman that can never be found. It isn't either alive or dead, and exists under every person's bed.
There is a reason why over 500 Zombie Apocalypse films were made for viewing alone with the vast majority of them in the last 30 years (589 films since the 1950s). Most all of these are based on some lethal 'virus' causing Zombies. They want to believe it because they have been conditioned for it up to this very moment. This sounds so-so like Henry Kissinger:
"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence.
It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil.
The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government." -- Henry Kissinger speaking at Evian, France, May 21, 1992 Bilderberg meeting. Unbeknownst to Kissinger, his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to the meeting.
See the long list of Zombie Apocalypse films. Tell me if this somehow affected the public mindset. I think it is pretty obvious. Don't you?
It has never been isolated because its a 'virus'. No virus has ever been isolated in the entire history of Virology. Furthermore, in the history of medicine, not one published study shows the isolation of identical particles that would represent a disease-causing virus from any body fluid from any sick person. The virus theory is only a working theory that has been accepted by the scientific community at large. Even former Pfizer VP of Research, Dr. Michael Yeadon after reviewing the research of Dr. Thomas Cowan now believes respiratory viruses do not exist.
There are many clues that tell us 'something' sinister is afoot with all these new 'viruses' the CDC announces each year. One such clue is that all synthetic pharmaceutical drugs compromise the immune system. If health is a real concern to Big Pharma then why isn't this important criterion mitigated in drugs? Secondly, why is there so much emphasis from the medical industry that our immune systems are inherently defective and thus, we need to all get vax☠xinated? Why is Natural immunity trivialized when our long history tells us it's the most important thing that got us here today in the first place? Why is the well established fact of good sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition for preventing the spread of diseases attacked by fact checkers on search engines? It's mind boggling if you think about this. This has been the requirement for every medical hospital for treating patients from the very beginning. Why wouldn't the same practice be used in society everywhere?
I'm still in the group who believe that viruses, in their various forms, are real. Here is a pretty good article on the subject: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/what-are-viruses-history-tobacco-mosaic-disease-180974480/
The Smithsonian Institute is not reputable when it comes to actual history and artifacts. They have single-handedly disappeared thousands of pieces of historical evidence all over America. So to me, the Smithsonian isn't a reputable authority on anything they print.
I think Dr. Michael Yeadon, who reviewed the evidence provided him from Dr. Tom Cowan is a good example of his academic education being based on secondary sources. This is actually quite common in many academic disciplines. Someone will source their 'findings' based on someone's study, which is sourced on someone else's study. It is equivalent to the barrel of monkey game. However, the primary source is never reviewed and verified.
No one has researched the primary sources like Dr. Cowan has. The entire virology field is based on sloppy fraudulent work. Then on top of this, other virologists used this to further their published work. Dr. Cowen exposes these unrepeatable clinical studies as shams. He shows this in an incontrovertible method and makes it clear to anyone. And look at the results when this primary sourced information was provided to Dr. Yeadon. Yeadon was blown away and realized he was misled in believing viruses existed.
Our natural immune system is king and dictates the quality of life. The virus was invented to scare people. It is the perfect Bogeyman that can never be found. It isn't either alive or dead, and exists under every person's bed.
There is a reason why over 500 Zombie Apocalypse films were made for viewing alone with the vast majority of them in the last 30 years (589 films since the 1950s). Most all of these are based on some lethal 'virus' causing Zombies. They want to believe it because they have been conditioned for it up to this very moment. This sounds so-so like Henry Kissinger:
See the long list of Zombie Apocalypse films. Tell me if this somehow affected the public mindset. I think it is pretty obvious. Don't you?
So what are the scanning electron microscopes photographing?
Dead cell debris. That's all its capable of viewing. Nothing lives under SEM. It's poisoned before the slide is put under the scope.