It’s already long past imo. Q was referring to the murals behind Kim Jong Un’s official state portraits and what they meant. There was a Q post confirming it too, post 846.
You're literally the first person I've heard say that.
I imagine most people on this site would disagree with you. That's sort of the issue with the vague statements, people interpret them however they feel.
Seems weird to just leave it up for open interpretation until you find something you think suits you
A venn diagram showing anons who were there as Q posted, and people on GA.win, would look like two barely touching circles. A review of Kim’s previous state portraits with other leaders was interesting, and implies that the deal Kim made with Trump will bring a peaceful end to the North Korean regime.
It’s already long past imo. Q was referring to the murals behind Kim Jong Un’s official state portraits and what they meant. There was a Q post confirming it too, post 846.
You're literally the first person I've heard say that.
I imagine most people on this site would disagree with you. That's sort of the issue with the vague statements, people interpret them however they feel.
Seems weird to just leave it up for open interpretation until you find something you think suits you
A venn diagram showing anons who were there as Q posted, and people on GA.win, would look like two barely touching circles. A review of Kim’s previous state portraits with other leaders was interesting, and implies that the deal Kim made with Trump will bring a peaceful end to the North Korean regime.
Time will tell, future will prove past.
Incredibly vague.
Yet to the people who speak the language in question, incredibly specific.