"What do I mean by force? Well, I mean that amount of force which is required to secure my rights, administered in the most humane way possible."
Very vague...what are you trying to achieve here? Even if there were any "takers", this public, heavily moderated and monitored forum would certainly NOT be the place to organize anything of the sort.
I’m not interested in organizing anything. It’s a discussion post. I want people to think about this, comment on it, wrestle with it. Why? Because wicked men and women will not stop until you have to make this decision. It is best if you’ve thought it through and made the decision before the moment of truth arrives. That’s all.
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
So let’s have a reasoned argument. Is it reasonable to believe that the men and women who orchestrated the raid of Mar a Lago are going to stop behaving poorly when it comes to your fundamental rights? And if that’s not reasonable, is it reasonable to consider the fact that you will have to decide how to respond? And is it reasonable to conclude that if you’re not willing to use force, you might end up fighting a war of ideas from a work camp?
Nice try FED shill...
So we’re still not ready?
Ok.
Look at my post history.
This is a legitimate issue. It’s the CORE issue our Founding Fathers wrestled with. But “muh glowies”, I guess.
Anyone else?
"What do I mean by force? Well, I mean that amount of force which is required to secure my rights, administered in the most humane way possible."
Very vague...what are you trying to achieve here? Even if there were any "takers", this public, heavily moderated and monitored forum would certainly NOT be the place to organize anything of the sort.
I’m not interested in organizing anything. It’s a discussion post. I want people to think about this, comment on it, wrestle with it. Why? Because wicked men and women will not stop until you have to make this decision. It is best if you’ve thought it through and made the decision before the moment of truth arrives. That’s all.
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
So let’s have a reasoned argument. Is it reasonable to believe that the men and women who orchestrated the raid of Mar a Lago are going to stop behaving poorly when it comes to your fundamental rights? And if that’s not reasonable, is it reasonable to consider the fact that you will have to decide how to respond? And is it reasonable to conclude that if you’re not willing to use force, you might end up fighting a war of ideas from a work camp?
Capital punishment backstreet fedboi