That’s kind of the point I was making. Perhaps “delta” wasn’t the best term to use. The way I see it, Trump fit in the word fishing into this because he knew we would look at drops from this date. It’s not confirming anything other than Trump is aware of the Q drops. We know he knows, but in my mind this just kind of shows it to us.
Yes, but the strength of a delta is if it predicts the future.
Not at all. Not at all.
Future proves past. This does not mean that Q is predicting dates. It means that when things unfold, they will prove the validity and relevance of Q's board drops.
Personally, I'm not a big fan of the approach to Q drops as if they are foreshadowing every little event in the future.
Things like 11.3 are different. These are pre-established dates. But I think that most of what Q was dropping in the close to 5000 drops are events, issues and matters that were current at the time, because the primary purpose was to activate anons, build a movement of people awake and aware of what was happening, and from that place, just expand.
To interpret and analyse and see beyond the surface, we don't need Q anymore. As a whole, we've progressed forward, based on what we've learned and the skills, attitude and approaches we've learned.
Plus, the overall Plan is out there.
Regarding dates, etc, Q clarified how the Plan works, when they referenced the 'countdown' cycles used when launching a rocket to the moon, for example.
There are points and thresholds that have to be reached for the countdown to continue, when certain issues or requirements can pause it.
Same indicated by the red lines. These indicate threshold points, or trigger points resulting in certain movements, rather than a predictive, flat line rigid timetable.
That’s kind of the point I was making. Perhaps “delta” wasn’t the best term to use. The way I see it, Trump fit in the word fishing into this because he knew we would look at drops from this date. It’s not confirming anything other than Trump is aware of the Q drops. We know he knows, but in my mind this just kind of shows it to us.
Not at all. Not at all.
Future proves past. This does not mean that Q is predicting dates. It means that when things unfold, they will prove the validity and relevance of Q's board drops.
Personally, I'm not a big fan of the approach to Q drops as if they are foreshadowing every little event in the future.
Things like 11.3 are different. These are pre-established dates. But I think that most of what Q was dropping in the close to 5000 drops are events, issues and matters that were current at the time, because the primary purpose was to activate anons, build a movement of people awake and aware of what was happening, and from that place, just expand.
To interpret and analyse and see beyond the surface, we don't need Q anymore. As a whole, we've progressed forward, based on what we've learned and the skills, attitude and approaches we've learned.
Plus, the overall Plan is out there.
Regarding dates, etc, Q clarified how the Plan works, when they referenced the 'countdown' cycles used when launching a rocket to the moon, for example.
u/#q2679
There are points and thresholds that have to be reached for the countdown to continue, when certain issues or requirements can pause it.
Same indicated by the red lines. These indicate threshold points, or trigger points resulting in certain movements, rather than a predictive, flat line rigid timetable.
u/#q4414