Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

22
Trump Suggests FBI May Have ‘Planted’ Evidence During Mar-a-Lago Raid
posted 3 years ago by aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve 3 years ago by aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve +22 / -0
12 comments share
12 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (12)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– Oblakhan 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

If there was evidence there, why didn't they take it in the first raid?

There was nothing there until they planted it, and likely it wasn't there then. It'll get in the boxes magically when they get them to their lair.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– CasuallyObservant 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I doubt that. Hey handshake. Trying to plant nasty lies here on the patriot board are you? We see you...

Chances are, the FBI did plant something. Otherwise, how do you explain their requirement that all security cameras be turned off?

Why did they arrange the raid only when they could confirm none of the Trump family would be there to observe and object?

And, why was Pres. Trump's personal staff made to leave the premises?

What were the Feds doing for 9 friggin' hours? They said that they 'knew exactly where to go and where it was' because of some inside source. So then what did they do for the rest of the 8 hrs. they were there? Hmmm?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– teamsters17 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

They didn’t turn the cameras off they subpoenaed the cameras. They want to see who was around the classified documnets. Cameras will tell the law who was around the documents. During a search the law enforcement want to remove anybody from the home who is not law enforcement. They remove them from the home so they can’t remove evidence. I don’t think they have a time limit on a search warrant!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CasuallyObservant 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Provide your source please.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Oblakhan 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Sounds like you belong somewhere another than a patriot board.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– teamsters17 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

That’s cool!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– CasuallyObservant 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Another handshake account.

I don't know. Are we sure he has the warrant in hand? They arrived when he wasn't there and left before he got home.

Do you think they left him a copy? Maybe they did, but what if what was on it was made up bullsh_t that the uninformed will assume is true? Why should he release it if that is the case?

According to the WaPo: "The affidavit supporting the warrant is probably sealed, former prosecutors say, and Attorney General Merrick Garland can seek to unseal it." FBI, the Justice Department and the judiciary all have copies.

Why don't you ask them to release it?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– teamsters17 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

https://nypost.com/2022/08/10/trump-team-wont-release-copy-of-mar-a-lago-fbi-raid-warrant/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CasuallyObservant 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Hey Handshake,

The article says this:

“No, we’re not releasing a copy of the warrant,” NBC News quoted a source close to Trump as saying. His attorney [and spokesperson] Christina Bobb did not immediately respond to a request for confirmation from The Post.

"A source close to Trump" - an unnamed source! But not his spokesperson or attorney?

Right. All these anonymous sources that are never revealed because they don't exist. And the link that is included further clarifies it with this:

"~A source close to Trump suggested last night to me that the burden of transparency rests with the DOJ to lay out its reasoning for the search warrant."

Who is the source? "Suggested" does not mean it happened.

Good Lord. Be more discerning, will you?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CasuallyObservant 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

According to the article:

"Agents initially resisted showing Trump spokeswoman Christina Bobb the warrant but ultimately did. But the agents would not allow any representatives of the former president to oversee the search, Bobb said. The justification for the search also remains under seal. Trump’s legal team plans on asking the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to unseal the search warrant affidavit, which would outline why authorities asked for the warrant."

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy