So just a few short weeks ago there was talk and and panic about New York prepping for a nuclear fallout type of incident. Now with the narrative that President Trump had the nuclear codes or whatever, one must ponder the possibility that they are getting ready for their false flag event involving nuclear weapons...
I really hope I am over thinking this...
I've got all the contemporaneous 8ch breads saved offline, and I've gone back over them. Anons pulled those pictures apart every which way, looked at similar other pictures and helicopters flying by on the same exact feed, there's simply no way it was a helicopter. At this point, the ball's on their side... prove it really was a helicopter.
Anons also dug into the island (which I've been and found it difficult to access, to have very few residents of whom Bill Gates is one, and there was some evidence of some kind of mkultra type school having been there once. Presumably whatever is hidden there is underground, since it's obviously easily seen from the air. The Q400 was followed by a military fighter jet, and the pics of the crash was weird, the plane was nowhere to be seen.
As for the coincidence, I've laid out what I see. The only other thing to add is Q post 1479, in which he posts an image of the very sub and invites us to do a reverse image search (in which we learn the sub's designation). This post was right after the Q400 crash. Why would Q highlight this?
The "sleepy" ref is chan talk, shills always show up and claim they see nothing and what's more, they're tired and isn't everyone else? Half joshing you, but it's surprising that you don't see loose threads all over this event. Theorizing is how we come to the truth, so what's your theory?
Since I am a scientist and engineer, I realize when there is no theory and just set the problem aside for the time being. Q also mentioned that there would be disinformation. (Too many scientists are psychologically intolerant of open questions and force everything into a theory, even if the force-fit is a bad fit. Astrophysics is in that condition.)
Asking questions ("Why would Q post an image of that sub?") does not imply any answers, much less a specific answer. If it was the SS Russell, it would have been 28 years dead and gone. So that is out of the question---even if it was capable of firing missiles, which it wasn't. I've been to two submarine bases and inside two nuclear submarines. I've taken the Navy course for industry on anti-submarine warfare. There is no way such constructions would slip out of custody, and nowhere they could be taken. There is no way a non-Navy submarine would be permitted to enter Puget Sound.
The only scenario that remotely makes sense would be if it was an SLBM launch from Hood Canal (Bangor?), not near Ketron Island. Vastly smaller population of possible witnesses. Conspiracy level down to just two people acting in concert. But still a hard sell.
I wasn't implying anything beyond the theory I've already put forth. It was an actual question: why post a picture of a sub with the same name as the guy who crashed a Q400 into ketron island right after it happened?
I don't share your faith that the sub couldn't have been stolen or allowed out of custody by corrupt individuals in positions of power. We live in a world in which events like 9/11 and covid are possible, a world where institutions like the CIA and FBI exist, a world where the US military is pushing tranny propaganda. I simply have zero faith in any of these institutions. The bad outnumber the good and have free run of everything.
I also don't share your faith that the military who famously allow generals who promise to give China advance notice of any attacks to continue to serve (as generals!) is defending the country or the executive in earnest. They're obviously capable of detecting such a sub, but the question is, were they motivated to detect and report that sub assuming it was there?
Lastly, I don't get why you're concerned about witnesses. It was witnessed! It was filmed! It wasn't a helicopter, at all, but they said it was, and everyone went "ok!" After covid, do you really think there are a bunch of critical thinkers out there, analyzing lights in the sky? It could have been a city-sized alien space vessel and if the news says it was a weather balloon, that's what they'll believe.
Some more circumstantial evidence, the G7 faggots (Trudeau especially) were acting like they'd never see Trump again. Trudeau was all smiles and giggles around Trump, but stabbed him in the back the second he was on his plane. Was he expecting a regime change?
Fren, I have no answer why Q posted that picture. And neither do you, nor anyone else. The simplest answer was to set us all on a wild goose chase. Or to shake up our assumptions about what is and is not "on the table" from the Bad Actors' point of view. Or [fill in the blank]. When it is an option to fill in the blank, it becomes a Rorschach blot and all we are doing is pursuing our own imaginations.
You don't get it. Subs are not controlled by "individuals." They are controlled by organizations that are both deep and broad. Security is tight. The Navy is perhaps the best service branch for keeping secrets. My dad was Navy and was a submariner. My brother was Navy and worked in aviation maintenance landside. I've worked on the P-8 program. They don't allow things like submarines to go missing. Too many people have "eyes on." Your job is to come up with positive evidence that it still exists, not some hypothesis that in some fantasy scenario it could exist.
As for the streak of light, my understanding is that it was a frame from a remote closed-circuit TV. A witness would be eyeballs. The story was that it was a navigation light of a copter passing overhead fast and made a visual smear during the frame interval of the photo. Good story, but it sure looked like an ascent trajectory. But again, not knowing for sure what it was is no evidence toward any particular presumption. You have to think like Sherlock Holmes, not like Detective Lieutenant Columbo.
I'm afraid you've lost me with the comment about Trudeau and Trump. I despise the former as much as I admire the latter.