They've done it that way since the beginning because they knew the highest # of side effects would occur in those first 14 days.
It's nearly impossible to find .gov funded studies where they don't lump those groups. I think both Scotland and Canada had it broken out for a few months till they realized how obviously bad it looked.
I've always read that problems (other than an immediate anaphylactic reaction while in your 15 mins waiting period) occur after the second shot (because it's usually within the 30 days, and doubles your jab load while initial load is still in there).
They've done it that way since the beginning because they knew the highest # of side effects would occur in those first 14 days.
It's nearly impossible to find .gov funded studies where they don't lump those groups. I think both Scotland and Canada had it broken out for a few months till they realized how obviously bad it looked.
I've always read that problems (other than an immediate anaphylactic reaction while in your 15 mins waiting period) occur after the second shot (because it's usually within the 30 days, and doubles your jab load while initial load is still in there).