This is just one of many issues that needs rectifying in our society. I understand Freedom of Speech and all the other freedoms outlined in the U.S. Constitution, but at some point, the über riche need to be recognized as institutions and not just simply private citizens when it comes to their "investments" and the narratives they put forward. We don't need super Billionaires driving our society off a cliff any more.
Ok, this is almost too much to read through. And I just don’t have time in my life to read all these!
However, I have serious concerns about Ranked Choice Voting. I made a post about it a couple of weeks ago..
We (Alaska, and probably Maine also), because we are the only two states using it right now, need some serious eyes on this voting method.
We need help as State citizens to understand it better - and because I am not a nerd with a computer and use my phone mostly, I have very serious concerns about this method of voting.
I am not a highly recognized anon, but I would certainly welcome your opinion on this subject of RCV.
You can read through my previous posts that didn’t get anywhere, but I’ve been sharing articles on our frustrations with understanding this method here in AK.
Can you help bring light to this subject alone?
I think it has many potential downfalls with layers of obfuscation. And could be used in future elections to really mess things up.
Thanks for ur help! I’m just a nurse!! Not an anon 😂🤷♀️
Oh, and I am a pure blood nurse and would have willingly been walked out of the hospital if I didn’t receive the cv vax on condition of employment. I held my ground and thankfully, since it is a Catholic Hospital, they accepted my Religious exemption, so far ….
I think they should argue RCV is subverting the principle of one person, one vote.
This only applies to contests with more than two candidates, since it only goes into effect if no one wins a majority, and in that case, the candidate with the lowest percentage of votes has his eliminated, and everyone who voted for him will have their second choice added to the totals.
So someone basically would get to cast a vote twice.
#30 of A-dog's articles - BIll Gates 300 million to media outlets. Narrative steering, complete!
This is just one of many issues that needs rectifying in our society. I understand Freedom of Speech and all the other freedoms outlined in the U.S. Constitution, but at some point, the über riche need to be recognized as institutions and not just simply private citizens when it comes to their "investments" and the narratives they put forward. We don't need super Billionaires driving our society off a cliff any more.
...he can't hide it any longer....
Ok, this is almost too much to read through. And I just don’t have time in my life to read all these!
However, I have serious concerns about Ranked Choice Voting. I made a post about it a couple of weeks ago..
We (Alaska, and probably Maine also), because we are the only two states using it right now, need some serious eyes on this voting method.
We need help as State citizens to understand it better - and because I am not a nerd with a computer and use my phone mostly, I have very serious concerns about this method of voting.
I am not a highly recognized anon, but I would certainly welcome your opinion on this subject of RCV.
You can read through my previous posts that didn’t get anywhere, but I’ve been sharing articles on our frustrations with understanding this method here in AK.
Can you help bring light to this subject alone?
I think it has many potential downfalls with layers of obfuscation. And could be used in future elections to really mess things up.
Thanks for ur help! I’m just a nurse!! Not an anon 😂🤷♀️
Oh, and I am a pure blood nurse and would have willingly been walked out of the hospital if I didn’t receive the cv vax on condition of employment. I held my ground and thankfully, since it is a Catholic Hospital, they accepted my Religious exemption, so far ….
I think they should argue RCV is subverting the principle of one person, one vote.
This only applies to contests with more than two candidates, since it only goes into effect if no one wins a majority, and in that case, the candidate with the lowest percentage of votes has his eliminated, and everyone who voted for him will have their second choice added to the totals.
So someone basically would get to cast a vote twice.
#31 IF Pompeo is a WH, why would Assange and his attorneys sue? Something smells funny here, and it isn't my shorts.
Even Trump's opinion on Assange is he is guilty of some sort of crime. I'm not sure what.
But in my six years on these Trump boards I've never seen a report of him defending Assange as being innocent.
...I have been seeing some interesting things about the Slim Fast Kid and how his "religious views" are intertwining with his politics....
Awwww, love Willow! Thanks ashlanddog !
...wags tail joyously....
o7
...doggy salutes....