When I've pointed out a Q proof to a doubter--usually when Q says something and then on the delta, anniversary of the post, Trump says the same thing, they will say "it is just a coincidence."
If you show them multiple Q proofs, they will say it is "confirmation bias"--the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.
They will insist that you are finding these coincidences because you are actively looking for them, and in time, they will show up. Think of if you just buy a new red Ford Focus. Suddenly you start noticing all of the other red Ford Focuses on the road.
Here is why this theory falls flat. If the Q proofs and the incredible coincidences were simply a case of "confirmation bias," we would be finding them everywhere than just Q proofs.
Anons would be finding these coincidences in Twitter posts by Ted Cruz, Hannity, Kari Lake, or any other conservative personality. The fact is that nobody ever never finds these concidences anywhere other than Trump (80%), Scavino (10%), Military (8%), Trump Family and others close to the President's mission (2%).
Of course, these people are the intellectually lazy types that will allow the TV to do the thinking for them, so good luck getting most of them to look into it further themselves.
Edit: Note: I'm referring to social media and public comments only made by public figures. World events that match up to Q posts would be in a category of its own.
I also edited the percents after someone mentioned Scavino often posts Q proofs, which I completely forgot about.
No Name's execution.
100% over the damn target! The No Name proof was the thing that convinced me, unquestionably, irrefutably. I am still shocked by how insane that was, to have "predicted" that timing exactly. It's so astonishing there really aren't words. I like to go back every so often and just look at it again to remind myself, sometimes for no reason sometimes after reading some semi-convincing doomer bullshit, this is it, this is all real, this is the truth. Its also a good reminder of just how crazy things are behind the curtain, that something like that could happen and be completely secreted away from the public and memory holed never to be heard from again. To this day the MSM avoids discussion of Senator Mc- [(beetlejuice)] like the plague... it's not for no reason. When folks say arrests are happening, or they took someone out, this latest one with Anne Heche... I mean it's my natural instinct almost to try and poke holes in it, we've all been trained to trust and be skeptics if it sounds abnormal to our sensibilities.... But that's just it, isn't it? We really don't know what is actually common or uncommon because we've been spoonfed the media lies and sculpted into obedience all of our lives. So much of "awakening" is a process of deprogramming ourselves and unlearning what we've been taught to know and accept as an answer.
There is no possible way to justify how that could possibly have been a coincedence or a happy accident. That's how I know, beyond any other single thing. You can't doom it away like all the rest of it, you just can't.
For me the real veil lifting moment came when that senator on CNN said "x days after John McCain was *put to death" as if that's the sort of thing you'd say as a 'slip of the tongue'.
Ohio governor John Kasich
Good memory. Kudos.