What do these things have in common?
Bitcoin, Russia, Tether, Evergrande, MIT Digital Currency Initiative, Jeffrey Epstein, Pedophilia, Centralized Financial Control, Silver & Gold
Read on.
I was happy and encouraged today to read in a recent sermon by an awake American pastor:
In China the Communist Party sent tanks in front of banks to stop protests by people who were prevented from withdrawing their savings. It is not wise to trust “digital” money and investments, which can be frozen. Real assets are our own skills and relationships, as well as land, precious metals, and, yes, weapons to defend our freedoms.
I specifically appreciated the reference to not trusting 'digital' money.
In the past few weeks, I have been listening to the "Crypto Conspiracy Podcast", which is a 24 part series looking at bitcoin, the emergence of cryptocurrencies, their relationship to the precious metals market, and the circumstances around the rise of bitcoin.
The Crypto Conspiracy Podcast Episode 1
The pitfalls of digital currencies
The events in Canada at the beginning of the year show us clearly what the Cabal intends to do: being able to shut off and steal the assets of those who stand up against their tyranny, as the Canadian Truckers did. A meme I saw yesterday made an exceedingly pithy point: Having you social media account banned or shut down for X days because you failed to follow "the Community Standards" is simply a precursor of how their social credit system will work, except that it's not just your social media account, but your assets, bank accounts, access to utilities, ability to travel, etc.
All of this - the ability to shut down patriots and those who resist their tyranny at the flick of a switch - relies on their digitized slave system of complete digital surveillance, digital ID and digital assets and currency. Even now, central banks around the world are moving to introduce their own digital currencies, which they - the government - will control completely.
The inherent weakness of cryptocurrencies
Crypto currencies, and specifically the flagship Bitcoin, have the image of being anonymous and decentralized. But this is a misnomer and a false image. Bitcoin is completely centralized in the blockchain; every single action and transaction is recorded and is in fact traceable. This reality has been proven by the various arrests and legal actions taken against certain bitcoin holders.
Even now, there are moves by the government authorities and central banks to take bitcoin down, and replace it with their own digital currency. Russia, for example, has moved to impose regulations on use of crypto, and how it can be used. All that really remains at this point is for governments in the world to pass legislation that regulates, or bans, the use of crypto in exchange for local currency, for example. This sort of move is not hard for them to do.
Evergrande & Tether
Explored in the podcast: Is Tether, touted as an asset-backed stable coin, really based on Evergrande paper debt?
The Epstein connections
What is really mind-blowing about the bitcoin situation is the undeniable number of links between bitcoin, its emergence, and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, M.I.T., bitcoin developers like Joichi Ito and Wladimir Van Der Laan, and those who hold and control major elements of the bitcoin world - all connected.
Even just an hour or two of digging turns up the following. Why is this element NOT being talked about more?
MIT Digital Currency Initiative
MIT Media Lab became notorious after Ito continued to accept funding from Epstein. For years even after his crimes were known, Ito even covered up the actual source of financing.
Sauce: Adam Back Linked to Jeffrey Epstein? Vitalik Buterin Refutes Claims
"The case of Jeffrey Epstein is full of twists and turns, but to summarize it in one word – vile. As a serial sexual assaulter with cases registered against him since 2008, the MIT Digital Currency Initiative still accepted funding from him, which in itself questions the character of those on the board of directors."
Sauce: https://crypto.news/jeffery-epsteins-mit-digital-currency-initiative-industry-concerns/
New documents show that the M.I.T. Media Lab was aware of Epstein’s status as a convicted sex offender, and that Epstein directed contributions to the lab far exceeding the amounts M.I.T. has publicly admitted.
Sauce: New Yorker Magazine article
Joichi (Joi) Ito
In Japan, he was a founder of Digital Garage, and helped establish and later became CEO of the country’s first commercial Internet service provider. He was an early investor in more than 40 companies, including Flickr, Six Apart, Last.fm, Kongregate, Kickstarter, and Twitter. Ito’s honors include TIME magazine’s “Cyber-Elite” listing in 1997 (at age 31) and selection as one of the “Global Leaders for Tomorrow” by the World Economic Forum (2001).
Sauce: https://www.futureyoungleaders.org/featured-young-leaders/joichi-ito/
Ito & Digital Garage: https://jp.linkedin.com/in/joiito
Epstein, Pedophilia, MIT Media Lab, Joichi Ito: https://themillenniumreport.com/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-mit-media-lab-and-the-bizarre-suiciding-of-aaron-swartz/
The series of podcasts is extensive, presented by 'Silver guru' David Morgan, but they reveal a much neglected investigation into how bitcoin started, who are the key players in the bitcoin world, and what the advent of bitcoin represents. Is it a coincidence that crypto came out and bitcoin emerged just as Obama rose to the presidency of the USA?
Comment: For many years now, I've had a hard time getting my head around crypto and bitcoin. There have been many conflicting views, like "cryptos will liberate everyone from the central banking system" to "crypto is the beast system that will be used to enslave humanity" etc.
The bigger picture
These podcasts paint a that indicates that, regardless of the value of the technology itself, crypto technology, and specifically bitcoin, etc., have been hijacked by the Cabal powerbrokers to their own advantage, firstly to drive populations away from the traditional storage of monetary value that precious metals (gold, silver, etc) have been, and secondly, to prepare the way for the introduction of centralized digital currencies that "can be frozen" at the drop of a hat.
I recommend this podcast series for all pedes, whether you have interest in gold and silver, or cryptos, or not. The picture these podcasts paint of the larger battlefield helps to put a LOT of what is happening around the world today in a perspective that is clearer than ever, and they point the way forward for those seeking to step outside of their tyranny. In particular, Podcast 14 brings a lot of the key content together. If you want to skip to the meaty part directly, have a listen to podcast 14.
The Crypto Conspiracy Podcast – Episode 14 - The Other Side of Crypto That Nobody Is Talking About
Either way, there is LOTS to dig on here.
__
You're wrong about Bitcoin; first of all Bitcoin never claimed to be anonymous and untraceable, in-fact it claims the exact opposite in the white-paper. It's traceable by design. You can now operate with other cryptocurrencies however (e.g. ZKSync Ethereum) which are truly untraceable due to the nature of ZKProofs, and that's a math proof of untracability, not just a speculation, it is not wrong.
Bitcoin is a middle finger to the establishment and cabal. Bitcoin throws a wrench in their plans which is why they are desparate to offset it within their own digital currencies (note: digital, not crypto, there is a huge difference, cryptocurrencies can't be controlled).
Also Bitcoin is not centralized; I don't know why you made that claim and then offered nothing to back it up. Bitcoin is fully decentralized, I myself run my own node and process my own transactions and distribute them to the peer-to-peer network, so what you've claimed is just patently wrong.
They're not desperate to stop people buying crypto at all. If they were, they'd be doing to it as they're doing to gold and silver and now nickel.
They are artificially increasing supply by selling IOUs. Basically like fractional reserves. If everyone holds their coins they can’t do that with crypto. Guess those “funds” are their attempt.
Time will tell whether what you describe turns out to be their attempt to keep people away from crypto, or just a bunch of rothschild wannabes trying to make their fortune off crypto like the roths did off gold.
Nor is anyone trying, which is the point.
Yes, they could stop you from buying bitcoin, in the same way they stop people buying gold and silver. They could sell as many paper bitcoins (bitcoin futures) as needed to keep the price of bitcoins so low that there's no gains to be had.
They can obviously do this, because they do it for gold, silver, nickel, and virtually every other commodity.
So, why haven't they?
(Because they WANT you to spend your money on meta-tier crypto "currency" that does them no harm at all, instead of helping jack up the price of gold and silver and revealing their fiat lie to the world).
Offered nothing to back it up?
So, you listened to the series of podcasts and vetted all the arguments and discussion?
The point of the post it to introduce the podcast. The main points of the post being:
One, the podcasts generated a view that I've not seen before, and which to me provide an expansive thinking framework that puts the entire bitcoin thing in a wholly different and more enlightening perspective.
Two, that Epstein's stains (and the stains of his network) ALL OVER bitcoin, for a reason.
Three, that there are pitfalls in digital currencies that many ignore and refuse to address.
The point of the post is not to say that crypto tech is inherently bad.
I'm certainly no expert or even highly informed in this area. However, it seems that many of the objections raised in the comment section are directly addressed and discussed in the podcast series, although the commentators appear to have NO knowledge of the podcast content.
Seems curious to me that even though No. 2, Epstein (and hence his controllers) are clearly all over Bitcoin, many appear to choose to ignore this fact, because they love the coin. (not saying that's you)
I work in the blockchain space for a living (hence my username), so I don't need to listen to the podcast, I have a master-level understanding of how cryptocurrencies work and much of what you said is not only false but indicates a lack of understanding of the subject matter because some of your statements are just incompatible in the context of what a crypto based system is.
Additionally, sorry if this comment comes off as rude, that's not my intent; I just want to be clear about my qualification to talk on this. I understand your skepticism towards crypto but the community needs to know that crypto is a God-send against corruption, the cabal fears it more than anything, I promise, it is the only asset on this Earth they can't control, because no matter how much authority you have, you can't change the laws of math.
Thanks for the comment, Elliptical. Thanks for a reasonably articulated and readable reply.
I'm pretty much Ok with being called out for any misrepresentations my post has made. I'm not highly educated in this field, and for sure, most statements I made could certainly be improved by knowledge and nuance.
Skepticism towards crypto? Hmmm... One thing I find very interesting, and telling, is the polarity in the nature of responses to the post. As I stated in the post itself:
"There have been many conflicting views, like "cryptos will liberate everyone from the central banking system" to "crypto is the beast system that will be used to enslave humanity" etc."
It's this polarizing effect that has puzzled me for quite a long time. The podcast series has illuminated this for me to a great extent. And, as the presenters in the podcast are often at pains to emphasize, they "are not anti-crypto. In fact, (we) believe crypto and blockchain tech are definitely going to be part of the future...."
What I think you've missed here is, and it's very probably because of the polarizing affect of the crypto/bitcoin topic, is the actual focus of the post: How deeply Epstein was involved with the developers, and the promotion, of bitcoin.
I certainly bear some responsibility for that, because the way I wrote the post gave plenty of fodder to cryptolovers to react against and come out swinging "hey, no, no , and no!", all while ignoring the title and focus of the post: Epstein's deep and intimate involvement with bitcoin.
Whether crypto is a God-send or not, that's a lower level issue. For me, the (possibly poorly expressed) focus of the post is, what is happening on the levels above that? Not :what are the pros and cons of the blockchain technology, but rather: is the cabal involved and using bitcoin and the entire crypto thing for some purpose? If so, what? Why?
God created all things wonderful, and good. Evil ever seeks to hijack, abuse, steal and manipulate God's creations for it's evil goals.
On a basic level, I am of the broad (and yet still relatively uninformed) opinion that (very, very likely) blockchain tech and (possibly) cryptos are a great technological development that can significantly serve humanity in our pursuit of God's ideals, BUT that also, the Cabal is doing things with this tech and arena that do NOT serve God, or us, and which abuses it.
It's that second point that I think is most discuss-worthy, not the former. There is (most likely) a plethora of places where the first part can be discussed, but the relevance of the topic to this board is the second part. And, in this area, your expertise, if you wish to frame it as that (and that's fine with me) is only partly useful.
in short, the real issues are NOT the technology and it's pros and cons, but rather, what the Cabal is doing in this context, by who, when and what.
And that is the focus of the podcasts, by the way. It's NOT a technical discussion of the technology. It's a look at a bigger picture.
It would likely challenge some of your ideas, but I still think its very worthy of a listen.
Final note
There are experts in every field. Expert car salesmen, expert stock traders, expert physicians. None of that expertise really helps them when dealing with the Cabal and the agenda to enslave us. That expertise can be utilized in fighting the Cabal, but it can, and more often is, utilized by the Cabal to keep those people shut down safe in their 'expert knowledge', without questioning the bigger picture.
I have a doctor I've been seeing for years. I really like him, he is very thorough and knowledgeable about his work as a doctor taking care of my health, and he is sincere in that area. But he has no idea about the C19 scam, is oblivious to this, and is still very mired deep in the illusion. IN fact, his expertise has become a massive barrier to his waking up to it, because of all the investment he has made in working in that space for a living..... When I asked, early on in 2021, if any of his other patients are requesting HCQ, he scoffed, and said none of his patients are that stupid!
I don't really question is mastery of the (field) he has (even though I believe allopathic medicine has a LOT to be desired). But it's clear his knowledge has become a barrier to him being able to break out of the matrix, and look at the larger picture.
I think it would take me too long to reply to every part you wrote; but I want to re-iterate one piece of crypto that is definitively true regardless of if I am blind by my knowledge or not, crypto can not be controlled. It is decentralized. No one has any authority to control it, not even its [unknown] creator. This is similar to how math can't be controller; if Isaac Newton declared "1+1=3 from now on" it wouldn't matter, he has no authority to change the laws of math; no one has authority to change the laws of a decentralized protocol.
I am sure Epstein was involved with lots of things, the man was evil but he was also a business man; if he invested a lot in a tech stock should we write-off that tech company forever just because one evil person was interested in personal-gain from it? I think using metrics like that as a litmus test for whether something is good or not is a dangerous fallacy.
Owning lots of Bitcoin does not give you any extra control over Bitcoin. They can't control it, does not matter how much they accumulate