What do these things have in common?
Bitcoin, Russia, Tether, Evergrande, MIT Digital Currency Initiative, Jeffrey Epstein, Pedophilia, Centralized Financial Control, Silver & Gold
Read on.
I was happy and encouraged today to read in a recent sermon by an awake American pastor:
In China the Communist Party sent tanks in front of banks to stop protests by people who were prevented from withdrawing their savings. It is not wise to trust “digital” money and investments, which can be frozen. Real assets are our own skills and relationships, as well as land, precious metals, and, yes, weapons to defend our freedoms.
I specifically appreciated the reference to not trusting 'digital' money.
In the past few weeks, I have been listening to the "Crypto Conspiracy Podcast", which is a 24 part series looking at bitcoin, the emergence of cryptocurrencies, their relationship to the precious metals market, and the circumstances around the rise of bitcoin.
The Crypto Conspiracy Podcast Episode 1
The pitfalls of digital currencies
The events in Canada at the beginning of the year show us clearly what the Cabal intends to do: being able to shut off and steal the assets of those who stand up against their tyranny, as the Canadian Truckers did. A meme I saw yesterday made an exceedingly pithy point: Having you social media account banned or shut down for X days because you failed to follow "the Community Standards" is simply a precursor of how their social credit system will work, except that it's not just your social media account, but your assets, bank accounts, access to utilities, ability to travel, etc.
All of this - the ability to shut down patriots and those who resist their tyranny at the flick of a switch - relies on their digitized slave system of complete digital surveillance, digital ID and digital assets and currency. Even now, central banks around the world are moving to introduce their own digital currencies, which they - the government - will control completely.
The inherent weakness of cryptocurrencies
Crypto currencies, and specifically the flagship Bitcoin, have the image of being anonymous and decentralized. But this is a misnomer and a false image. Bitcoin is completely centralized in the blockchain; every single action and transaction is recorded and is in fact traceable. This reality has been proven by the various arrests and legal actions taken against certain bitcoin holders.
Even now, there are moves by the government authorities and central banks to take bitcoin down, and replace it with their own digital currency. Russia, for example, has moved to impose regulations on use of crypto, and how it can be used. All that really remains at this point is for governments in the world to pass legislation that regulates, or bans, the use of crypto in exchange for local currency, for example. This sort of move is not hard for them to do.
Evergrande & Tether
Explored in the podcast: Is Tether, touted as an asset-backed stable coin, really based on Evergrande paper debt?
The Epstein connections
What is really mind-blowing about the bitcoin situation is the undeniable number of links between bitcoin, its emergence, and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, M.I.T., bitcoin developers like Joichi Ito and Wladimir Van Der Laan, and those who hold and control major elements of the bitcoin world - all connected.
Even just an hour or two of digging turns up the following. Why is this element NOT being talked about more?
MIT Digital Currency Initiative
MIT Media Lab became notorious after Ito continued to accept funding from Epstein. For years even after his crimes were known, Ito even covered up the actual source of financing.
Sauce: Adam Back Linked to Jeffrey Epstein? Vitalik Buterin Refutes Claims
"The case of Jeffrey Epstein is full of twists and turns, but to summarize it in one word – vile. As a serial sexual assaulter with cases registered against him since 2008, the MIT Digital Currency Initiative still accepted funding from him, which in itself questions the character of those on the board of directors."
Sauce: https://crypto.news/jeffery-epsteins-mit-digital-currency-initiative-industry-concerns/
New documents show that the M.I.T. Media Lab was aware of Epstein’s status as a convicted sex offender, and that Epstein directed contributions to the lab far exceeding the amounts M.I.T. has publicly admitted.
Sauce: New Yorker Magazine article
Joichi (Joi) Ito
In Japan, he was a founder of Digital Garage, and helped establish and later became CEO of the country’s first commercial Internet service provider. He was an early investor in more than 40 companies, including Flickr, Six Apart, Last.fm, Kongregate, Kickstarter, and Twitter. Ito’s honors include TIME magazine’s “Cyber-Elite” listing in 1997 (at age 31) and selection as one of the “Global Leaders for Tomorrow” by the World Economic Forum (2001).
Sauce: https://www.futureyoungleaders.org/featured-young-leaders/joichi-ito/
Ito & Digital Garage: https://jp.linkedin.com/in/joiito
Epstein, Pedophilia, MIT Media Lab, Joichi Ito: https://themillenniumreport.com/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-mit-media-lab-and-the-bizarre-suiciding-of-aaron-swartz/
The series of podcasts is extensive, presented by 'Silver guru' David Morgan, but they reveal a much neglected investigation into how bitcoin started, who are the key players in the bitcoin world, and what the advent of bitcoin represents. Is it a coincidence that crypto came out and bitcoin emerged just as Obama rose to the presidency of the USA?
Comment: For many years now, I've had a hard time getting my head around crypto and bitcoin. There have been many conflicting views, like "cryptos will liberate everyone from the central banking system" to "crypto is the beast system that will be used to enslave humanity" etc.
The bigger picture
These podcasts paint a that indicates that, regardless of the value of the technology itself, crypto technology, and specifically bitcoin, etc., have been hijacked by the Cabal powerbrokers to their own advantage, firstly to drive populations away from the traditional storage of monetary value that precious metals (gold, silver, etc) have been, and secondly, to prepare the way for the introduction of centralized digital currencies that "can be frozen" at the drop of a hat.
I recommend this podcast series for all pedes, whether you have interest in gold and silver, or cryptos, or not. The picture these podcasts paint of the larger battlefield helps to put a LOT of what is happening around the world today in a perspective that is clearer than ever, and they point the way forward for those seeking to step outside of their tyranny. In particular, Podcast 14 brings a lot of the key content together. If you want to skip to the meaty part directly, have a listen to podcast 14.
The Crypto Conspiracy Podcast – Episode 14 - The Other Side of Crypto That Nobody Is Talking About
Either way, there is LOTS to dig on here.
__
Thanks for the comment, Elliptical. Thanks for a reasonably articulated and readable reply.
I'm pretty much Ok with being called out for any misrepresentations my post has made. I'm not highly educated in this field, and for sure, most statements I made could certainly be improved by knowledge and nuance.
Skepticism towards crypto? Hmmm... One thing I find very interesting, and telling, is the polarity in the nature of responses to the post. As I stated in the post itself:
"There have been many conflicting views, like "cryptos will liberate everyone from the central banking system" to "crypto is the beast system that will be used to enslave humanity" etc."
It's this polarizing effect that has puzzled me for quite a long time. The podcast series has illuminated this for me to a great extent. And, as the presenters in the podcast are often at pains to emphasize, they "are not anti-crypto. In fact, (we) believe crypto and blockchain tech are definitely going to be part of the future...."
What I think you've missed here is, and it's very probably because of the polarizing affect of the crypto/bitcoin topic, is the actual focus of the post: How deeply Epstein was involved with the developers, and the promotion, of bitcoin.
I certainly bear some responsibility for that, because the way I wrote the post gave plenty of fodder to cryptolovers to react against and come out swinging "hey, no, no , and no!", all while ignoring the title and focus of the post: Epstein's deep and intimate involvement with bitcoin.
Whether crypto is a God-send or not, that's a lower level issue. For me, the (possibly poorly expressed) focus of the post is, what is happening on the levels above that? Not :what are the pros and cons of the blockchain technology, but rather: is the cabal involved and using bitcoin and the entire crypto thing for some purpose? If so, what? Why?
God created all things wonderful, and good. Evil ever seeks to hijack, abuse, steal and manipulate God's creations for it's evil goals.
On a basic level, I am of the broad (and yet still relatively uninformed) opinion that (very, very likely) blockchain tech and (possibly) cryptos are a great technological development that can significantly serve humanity in our pursuit of God's ideals, BUT that also, the Cabal is doing things with this tech and arena that do NOT serve God, or us, and which abuses it.
It's that second point that I think is most discuss-worthy, not the former. There is (most likely) a plethora of places where the first part can be discussed, but the relevance of the topic to this board is the second part. And, in this area, your expertise, if you wish to frame it as that (and that's fine with me) is only partly useful.
in short, the real issues are NOT the technology and it's pros and cons, but rather, what the Cabal is doing in this context, by who, when and what.
And that is the focus of the podcasts, by the way. It's NOT a technical discussion of the technology. It's a look at a bigger picture.
It would likely challenge some of your ideas, but I still think its very worthy of a listen.
Final note
There are experts in every field. Expert car salesmen, expert stock traders, expert physicians. None of that expertise really helps them when dealing with the Cabal and the agenda to enslave us. That expertise can be utilized in fighting the Cabal, but it can, and more often is, utilized by the Cabal to keep those people shut down safe in their 'expert knowledge', without questioning the bigger picture.
I have a doctor I've been seeing for years. I really like him, he is very thorough and knowledgeable about his work as a doctor taking care of my health, and he is sincere in that area. But he has no idea about the C19 scam, is oblivious to this, and is still very mired deep in the illusion. IN fact, his expertise has become a massive barrier to his waking up to it, because of all the investment he has made in working in that space for a living..... When I asked, early on in 2021, if any of his other patients are requesting HCQ, he scoffed, and said none of his patients are that stupid!
I don't really question is mastery of the (field) he has (even though I believe allopathic medicine has a LOT to be desired). But it's clear his knowledge has become a barrier to him being able to break out of the matrix, and look at the larger picture.
I think it would take me too long to reply to every part you wrote; but I want to re-iterate one piece of crypto that is definitively true regardless of if I am blind by my knowledge or not, crypto can not be controlled. It is decentralized. No one has any authority to control it, not even its [unknown] creator. This is similar to how math can't be controller; if Isaac Newton declared "1+1=3 from now on" it wouldn't matter, he has no authority to change the laws of math; no one has authority to change the laws of a decentralized protocol.
I am sure Epstein was involved with lots of things, the man was evil but he was also a business man; if he invested a lot in a tech stock should we write-off that tech company forever just because one evil person was interested in personal-gain from it? I think using metrics like that as a litmus test for whether something is good or not is a dangerous fallacy.
thanks,
I think you missed a lot of points, and jumped to some mistaken conclusions.
Firstly, there are different forms of centralization. Any crypto that uses a blockchain is invariably centralized in that blockchain. 100% The fact that the blockchain is distributed does not decentralize it; it simply decentralizes control of it. This fact is borne out by the reality that if you have a copy of the ledger, you have a copy of ALL the ledgers.
If someone wants to get the entire transaction history of bitcoin, they only need ONE copy of the blockchain. That's centralized. That they cannot alter it unilaterally is an entirely different matter. The information is centralized, even if the ability to shape that information is not. Am I wrong here? I don't see how.
"should we write-off that tech company forever just because ...."
Where did anyone say to write off a tech company, because one evil person? No one is using or even suggesting to use that litmus test. You've missed the point.
The questions here are: why was Epstein so involved? How was he involved? Is he the only 'evil person' involved here?
I mean, you are on a Q board. You should really be asking questions, and digging, and working out what is going on behind the scenes, rather than defending a particular technology because you have a powerful bias towards it. Don't you think?
This seems rather a naive comment to me. (no offense intended). Do you think that Epstein was pedo and he had a thing for young girls, and that was his hobby, but in the rest of his life, he was just another businessman out to make some bucks?
You don't think Epstein was an operation, working at the highest levels for the Cabal in blackmailing, etc? And, when he had a 'business interest', it was all just legit, because he's a businessman? Why did people doing the bitcoin development CONTINUE to receive funding from Epstein even after he was convicted on sexual predator charges? Does that not at a minimum suggest something stinks?
Same with JP Morgan. Epstein had a long term relationship with JP Morgan bank, which has at least 3 felony convictions against it, paid billions in penalties, and yet, continued to court Epstein.
“When Jeffrey Epstein was serving time in Florida for soliciting prostitution from a minor, he got a surprising visitor: James E. Staley, a top JPMorgan Chase executive and one of the highest-ranking figures on Wall Street.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/22/business/jeffrey-epstein-business-wall-street.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190811034518/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/08/business/jeffrey-epstein-jpmorgan.html
Now, JP Morgan execs have just been convicted of operating manipulation schemes targeting gold and silver. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-jp-morgan-traders-convicted-fraud-attempted-price-manipulation-and-spoofing-multi-year
Interesting, no?
What about the others involved in bitcoin development, like Joichi Ito?
The point here is certainly not to say that crypto is bad, or even that bitcoin is bad. The point here is, what is going on? is there something going on behind the scenes? If so, what? Who? etc.
Ignoring or refusing to look at this area because of a bias and hope towards crypto or bitcoin is a normie-like response, not an anon response. IMO.
You’re talking about centralization of information. When people say “decentralization” they are typically talking about decentralization of power. I don’t personally consider centralization of information a threat.
Blockchains aren’t inherently public; for example Monero uses Loop Ring Signatures to obfuscate transaction records, when used properly, no one can track transactions along that blockchain.