I read an article a while back that was astonishing. Below a certain IQ, people fail to have an 'internal monologue'. They do not think with words. Without the ability to 'debate' in their heads, there can be no logic - no critical thinking. Every single action, motivation, and/or decision is purely emotion-based.
Imagine how easy it is to manipulate these people.
Now I'm sure that most 'normies' out there that are well above that IQ threshold - but I suspect that Cabal-associated psychologists have figured out how to 'train' people how to lose that 'inner monologue'. (Public schools, anyone?)
Holy shit. I've never really looked at myself as an intelligent individual, but it's particularly horrifying to suddenly realize just how stupid a lot of people really are.
"I don't have a inner monologue either. Any time I have to communicate outside my head with words, I have to "translate" what I'm thinking. That takes time and effort. It's why I vastly prefer written communication over verbal, since you can take more time than the instant response a verbal conversation requires,"
I wonder if it’s IQ vs simply not being taught formal logic. In decades past children, even in public schools, were taught Latin, formal logic, and more rigorous math. Each of these subjects stimulates logical reasoning and word based thinking, and they’ve all been dumbed down or removed from public education in the past 50 years or so.
Hard to imagine. I've also heard that a lot of people don't dream in color. It's counterintuitive when a person's "waking life" is in color that they would dream in greys.
Dolores Cannon talked about people who were fillers - can't remember what she called them - like game npc''s. Hopi prophecy says there will be living bodies with no souls at the end.
She called them background people.
This is so fascinating! I have often thought that i don't miss other people's company now I have lived alone for so long because I have more interesting conversations with myself in my head.
Now this topic is coming up all over the place. I read somewhere that probably only a small percentage of the 8 billion of us are humans with a soul.
And also that when we find out how few real libby leftards there are, we will all be surprised. Most of the ones on social media are bots.
So that's NPCs, bots and background people all filling up space all over the place and hardly anyone to talk to except ourselves.
Wow that is crazy to me, I just assumed everyone talked to themselves and thought about stuff. No wonder they dumb down the education system.
Side note: my friend has low IQ (85 i think) with a learning disability and definitely has internal dialogue because shes starting to question things, tends to over think and is stepping away from the left. Super interesting
They do try to train it out of you through socialization or, for some, over-socialization. I've also seen it called demiotic-induced neurosis, which I think is a portmanteau of "democratic" and "semiotic"; instead of having your own signs and symbols in your brain referencing things you believe, have experienced or know, many of these signs and symbols have been induced and replaced by others through verbal repetition, thereby fully or partially nullifying your own internal monologue through use of your own symbolization. You couldn't learn without this process but it is incredibly important who does it, why they're doing it and how they do it.
Since these signs and symbols (words, pictures, abstractions, representations, etc.) are not your own, you become a bit of a stranger to yourself in a way and thus require others for validating almost any thought you might have on your own (as they will inevitably conflict with the group-thought inculcated through the process of socialization). If these imbued representations are outright wrong then there are other problems that will possibly arise.
Fun, hopefully unrelated, note: back in the mid 20th century, the Dutch psychiatric researcher Joost Meerloo noticed that when large swaths of the population lose their individual identities at once or in brief, successive phases, the process pretty much invites a demagogue to come in and think for them.
A certain small amount of alienation from yourself is probably good so as to be capable of empathizing/sympathizing with others and to learn and grow, but too much is how we end up with world wars and genocide. The statement "I am" is so so so so so so much better than "we are Legion." And one who "is" understands this much better than those who "are."
I read an article a while back that was astonishing. Below a certain IQ, people fail to have an 'internal monologue'. They do not think with words. Without the ability to 'debate' in their heads, there can be no logic - no critical thinking. Every single action, motivation, and/or decision is purely emotion-based.
Imagine how easy it is to manipulate these people.
Now I'm sure that most 'normies' out there that are well above that IQ threshold - but I suspect that Cabal-associated psychologists have figured out how to 'train' people how to lose that 'inner monologue'. (Public schools, anyone?)
Complete slaves to their emotions.
This may not be the article I read, but it's on the subject (with further links): https://www.iflscience.com/people-with-no-internal-monologue-explain-what-its-like-in-their-head-57739
Holy shit. I've never really looked at myself as an intelligent individual, but it's particularly horrifying to suddenly realize just how stupid a lot of people really are.
"I don't have a inner monologue either. Any time I have to communicate outside my head with words, I have to "translate" what I'm thinking. That takes time and effort. It's why I vastly prefer written communication over verbal, since you can take more time than the instant response a verbal conversation requires,"
Good God.
We are a people of morons!
I wonder if it’s IQ vs simply not being taught formal logic. In decades past children, even in public schools, were taught Latin, formal logic, and more rigorous math. Each of these subjects stimulates logical reasoning and word based thinking, and they’ve all been dumbed down or removed from public education in the past 50 years or so.
Hard to imagine. I've also heard that a lot of people don't dream in color. It's counterintuitive when a person's "waking life" is in color that they would dream in greys.
Dolores Cannon talked about people who were fillers - can't remember what she called them - like game npc''s. Hopi prophecy says there will be living bodies with no souls at the end.
She called them background people. This is so fascinating! I have often thought that i don't miss other people's company now I have lived alone for so long because I have more interesting conversations with myself in my head.
Now this topic is coming up all over the place. I read somewhere that probably only a small percentage of the 8 billion of us are humans with a soul. And also that when we find out how few real libby leftards there are, we will all be surprised. Most of the ones on social media are bots.
So that's NPCs, bots and background people all filling up space all over the place and hardly anyone to talk to except ourselves.
Wow that is crazy to me, I just assumed everyone talked to themselves and thought about stuff. No wonder they dumb down the education system.
Side note: my friend has low IQ (85 i think) with a learning disability and definitely has internal dialogue because shes starting to question things, tends to over think and is stepping away from the left. Super interesting
They do try to train it out of you through socialization or, for some, over-socialization. I've also seen it called demiotic-induced neurosis, which I think is a portmanteau of "democratic" and "semiotic"; instead of having your own signs and symbols in your brain referencing things you believe, have experienced or know, many of these signs and symbols have been induced and replaced by others through verbal repetition, thereby fully or partially nullifying your own internal monologue through use of your own symbolization. You couldn't learn without this process but it is incredibly important who does it, why they're doing it and how they do it.
Since these signs and symbols (words, pictures, abstractions, representations, etc.) are not your own, you become a bit of a stranger to yourself in a way and thus require others for validating almost any thought you might have on your own (as they will inevitably conflict with the group-thought inculcated through the process of socialization). If these imbued representations are outright wrong then there are other problems that will possibly arise.
Fun, hopefully unrelated, note: back in the mid 20th century, the Dutch psychiatric researcher Joost Meerloo noticed that when large swaths of the population lose their individual identities at once or in brief, successive phases, the process pretty much invites a demagogue to come in and think for them.
A certain small amount of alienation from yourself is probably good so as to be capable of empathizing/sympathizing with others and to learn and grow, but too much is how we end up with world wars and genocide. The statement "I am" is so so so so so so much better than "we are Legion." And one who "is" understands this much better than those who "are."
ed: name typo