I really dont think you understand that flying a 747 is a fingertip operation, a tiny, tiny movement of the stick will change the course of the plane by over a 100m. Professional pilots have tried to hit the world trade center hundreds of times in simulation and failed 99% of the time. No, really.
Further, there are dozens of videos of people not reacting to ANY sound whatsoever until the explosion, despite a supposed 747 flying directly above their head.
Look man, you can watch the documentary which shows how every angle was done according to well-established CGI technique, or you can continue to think you know already and stay in denial.
So if I was one of my co-workers who stood on the shore of the Hudson River, directly across from the WTC, and saw a jet fly down, do a u-turn, and fly back into the south tower, you would tell me I was watching CGI?
Do you know how easy it is to convince people they saw something?
There were numerous military jets flying low over NYC that day. As the fox news reporter said to the guy who stood at the foot of the towers saying it was clearly a bomb and there was no plane, "We know it was a a plane, we saw it on tell-a-vision".
Look man, I know your co-workers think they saw a plane. So do 300mm other americans. The unfortunate reality is that 1. it is not possible for even a highly trained pilot to steer a 747 into a building. For the third time, dozens of professional pilots got in 747 flight simulators and tried to hit the world trade center and WERE UNABLE TO DO SO. You can still watch the video of them discussing this to this day. 2. quarter inch thick aluminum would crumple on the outside of the building 3. impossible cell phone calls were said to have occurred that are literally physically impossible 4. there is still to this day evidence of shitty mask layers used that accidently have the nose-tip of the "plane" coming out the far side of the world trade center, a nose so fragile that when a bird hits it the entire thing collapses, but it somehow made it through 2000 steel columns 5. the plane engine found in NYC on 9/11 was from the completely wrong type of aircraft 6. the passport from the supposed plane was completely unharmed despite the "plane" literally atomizing in a fireball. 7 numerous famous videos of people screaming that there was a plane turned out to be long-time military/intelligence assets and/or future hollywood directors, no really.
Again, basic physics completely denies what you believe to be true. In 1945, in planning for 9/11, the U.S. military rammed a MILITARY BOMBER into the empire state building. Do you know what happened? A tiny fucking hole and the airplane crumpled on the outside of the building. Were you aware of this?
All the information is there for you to learn, but your ego will continue to get in the way. Every law of physics was broken on 9/11, but everyone accepts it because of FEAR.
The evidence for mask layers and CGI is overwhelming in "9/11 great american psy-opera", with the plane literally coming out of the far side of the building. but you continue to refuse to look because you are already sure what happened.
I was aware of the plane crash into the Empire State Building; that is a solid brick and mortar building totally unlike the WTC towers, but that is another topic of discussion. I will speak with the co-workers to have them tell me what they saw. What about the thousands of people who were standing on the ground, a block or two from the WTC towers, when the 2nd plane hit? I suppose that the speed of a jet wouldn't allow definitive i.d. of it, and TV video of it later on could cause their memory to be altered. I watched the camera feed from the Empire State Building that morning and saw what looked like a relatively slow moving aircraft moving from west to east, then the explosion, and I thought at the time, "Wow, some small plane loaded with explosives just hit the tower!", but it was the jet moving from SSW to NNE, at a high speed, that gave that illusion. I will check out the other aspects you have reported. The pilots saying it wouldn't be possible to fly the plane the way it supposedly was has me the most curious.
Since it is so obvious that they are lying about the Pentagon attack, it certainly puts into question all the narrative surrounding the WTC attack. Thank you for opening me up to further consideration of all things 9/11
watch #7 THE KEY by AceBaker. theres some excellent stuff in that episode, especially pertaining to the cameraman of chopper 5 on the morning of 911 and his specialty, which is none other than video compositing [i.e. how to insert a plane into a video clip] https://www.pmjmp.org/post/9-11-the-great-american-psy-opera
I really dont think you understand that flying a 747 is a fingertip operation, a tiny, tiny movement of the stick will change the course of the plane by over a 100m. Professional pilots have tried to hit the world trade center hundreds of times in simulation and failed 99% of the time. No, really.
Further, there are dozens of videos of people not reacting to ANY sound whatsoever until the explosion, despite a supposed 747 flying directly above their head.
Look man, you can watch the documentary which shows how every angle was done according to well-established CGI technique, or you can continue to think you know already and stay in denial.
So if I was one of my co-workers who stood on the shore of the Hudson River, directly across from the WTC, and saw a jet fly down, do a u-turn, and fly back into the south tower, you would tell me I was watching CGI?
Do you know how easy it is to convince people they saw something?
There were numerous military jets flying low over NYC that day. As the fox news reporter said to the guy who stood at the foot of the towers saying it was clearly a bomb and there was no plane, "We know it was a a plane, we saw it on tell-a-vision".
Look man, I know your co-workers think they saw a plane. So do 300mm other americans. The unfortunate reality is that 1. it is not possible for even a highly trained pilot to steer a 747 into a building. For the third time, dozens of professional pilots got in 747 flight simulators and tried to hit the world trade center and WERE UNABLE TO DO SO. You can still watch the video of them discussing this to this day. 2. quarter inch thick aluminum would crumple on the outside of the building 3. impossible cell phone calls were said to have occurred that are literally physically impossible 4. there is still to this day evidence of shitty mask layers used that accidently have the nose-tip of the "plane" coming out the far side of the world trade center, a nose so fragile that when a bird hits it the entire thing collapses, but it somehow made it through 2000 steel columns 5. the plane engine found in NYC on 9/11 was from the completely wrong type of aircraft 6. the passport from the supposed plane was completely unharmed despite the "plane" literally atomizing in a fireball. 7 numerous famous videos of people screaming that there was a plane turned out to be long-time military/intelligence assets and/or future hollywood directors, no really.
Again, basic physics completely denies what you believe to be true. In 1945, in planning for 9/11, the U.S. military rammed a MILITARY BOMBER into the empire state building. Do you know what happened? A tiny fucking hole and the airplane crumpled on the outside of the building. Were you aware of this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4i_uH49B08
All the information is there for you to learn, but your ego will continue to get in the way. Every law of physics was broken on 9/11, but everyone accepts it because of FEAR.
The evidence for mask layers and CGI is overwhelming in "9/11 great american psy-opera", with the plane literally coming out of the far side of the building. but you continue to refuse to look because you are already sure what happened.
I was aware of the plane crash into the Empire State Building; that is a solid brick and mortar building totally unlike the WTC towers, but that is another topic of discussion. I will speak with the co-workers to have them tell me what they saw. What about the thousands of people who were standing on the ground, a block or two from the WTC towers, when the 2nd plane hit? I suppose that the speed of a jet wouldn't allow definitive i.d. of it, and TV video of it later on could cause their memory to be altered. I watched the camera feed from the Empire State Building that morning and saw what looked like a relatively slow moving aircraft moving from west to east, then the explosion, and I thought at the time, "Wow, some small plane loaded with explosives just hit the tower!", but it was the jet moving from SSW to NNE, at a high speed, that gave that illusion. I will check out the other aspects you have reported. The pilots saying it wouldn't be possible to fly the plane the way it supposedly was has me the most curious.
This is a pretty good account of how the Pentagon damage could not have been caused by a jet:
https://aldeilis.net/english/a-boeing-757-did-not-hit-the-pentagon/
Since it is so obvious that they are lying about the Pentagon attack, it certainly puts into question all the narrative surrounding the WTC attack. Thank you for opening me up to further consideration of all things 9/11
watch #7 THE KEY by AceBaker. theres some excellent stuff in that episode, especially pertaining to the cameraman of chopper 5 on the morning of 911 and his specialty, which is none other than video compositing [i.e. how to insert a plane into a video clip] https://www.pmjmp.org/post/9-11-the-great-american-psy-opera